What are they doing to Any Questions?!
I am getting very close to giving up on Any Questions - a programme to which I have devoted every available Saturday for half a century. The problem for me is the new host, Chris Mason, who has presumably been appointed as the BBC's nod to regionality, being a straight-speaking Northener, and all that.
Chris Mason replaced Jonathan Dimbleby, who - like his brother on the BBC's sister telly programme - had become increasingly irritating with his interventions, which were frequently ponderously pedantic, and to all intents aimed at helping the opposing point of view not to omit some observation or criticism he considered indispensable, or that Joe Public should be made to see as important, when he should have just stuck to chairing and leaving it to panel members to defend their own positions. But Mason has gone much further and turned this tendency into what has effectively become conversation, driven as he appears to be to bring in things that are obviously bothering him or his boss, regardless of whether or not it has the listener. And not only this: he fires off his interjections well before the panellist has had any chance of outlining his or her position, often halfway through his or her second sentence. Today's belligerent go's on at least two occasions at Tory minister Amanda Milling, for whom I hold no brief, and who, following a second attempt to elicit clarity was clearly not going to give any direct answer to his question, repeatedly left the other contributers on-line hanging while needless petty insistence on his part on getting his reward used up valuable discussion time. This had me literally screaming at the radio "Get on with the ******* programme for god's sake!!!"
Politicians refusing to give straight answers is old hat - there cannot be anyone who is not by now in the know; Mason should leave it to the intelligence of the listener to deduce that the respondent is playing evasive; he has an attitude problem totally unsuited to chairing reputable discussion on matters of vital importance, and should either get off his high horse or be replaced.
I am getting very close to giving up on Any Questions - a programme to which I have devoted every available Saturday for half a century. The problem for me is the new host, Chris Mason, who has presumably been appointed as the BBC's nod to regionality, being a straight-speaking Northener, and all that.
Chris Mason replaced Jonathan Dimbleby, who - like his brother on the BBC's sister telly programme - had become increasingly irritating with his interventions, which were frequently ponderously pedantic, and to all intents aimed at helping the opposing point of view not to omit some observation or criticism he considered indispensable, or that Joe Public should be made to see as important, when he should have just stuck to chairing and leaving it to panel members to defend their own positions. But Mason has gone much further and turned this tendency into what has effectively become conversation, driven as he appears to be to bring in things that are obviously bothering him or his boss, regardless of whether or not it has the listener. And not only this: he fires off his interjections well before the panellist has had any chance of outlining his or her position, often halfway through his or her second sentence. Today's belligerent go's on at least two occasions at Tory minister Amanda Milling, for whom I hold no brief, and who, following a second attempt to elicit clarity was clearly not going to give any direct answer to his question, repeatedly left the other contributers on-line hanging while needless petty insistence on his part on getting his reward used up valuable discussion time. This had me literally screaming at the radio "Get on with the ******* programme for god's sake!!!"
Politicians refusing to give straight answers is old hat - there cannot be anyone who is not by now in the know; Mason should leave it to the intelligence of the listener to deduce that the respondent is playing evasive; he has an attitude problem totally unsuited to chairing reputable discussion on matters of vital importance, and should either get off his high horse or be replaced.
Comment