Originally posted by oddoneout
View Post
Grumble Thread
Collapse
X
-
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
-
-
Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Postfacial recognition
As usual I dismissed it without a second thought"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post
I didn't know there was computer version. I can never find a 'Remember me' option for my phone apps. This morning BBC news unusually asked me to sign in (on the phone) but I just clicked 'Not now, dear' and it went away.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Old Grumpy View PostSmartphone access to NHS app can also be via fingerprint detection or facial recognition.
Now done.
But I still didn't respond to today's message asking me to rate my experience yesterday, getting my flu and Covid jabs.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Old Grumpy View PostSmartphone access to NHS app can also be via fingerprint detection or facial recognition.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostI can’t be bothered, so I print out a request for my prescription, drive a few miles to put it in the box at the surgery, then try to collect the prescription ia few days later. Sometimes it’s there - sometimes it’s gone to another pharmacy. I have also tried dropping repeat prescriptions back at the pharmacy, but that then appears to take longer as the method seems -as far as I can tell- to be that the paper is transferred back to the surgery- about eight miles away- then a doctor reviews and signs it - then the paperwork is returned back to the pharmacy a day or two later. I often check with a phone call to see if the paperwork or meds have arrived at the pharmacy, with about a 60% success rate.
Both the pharmacy and the surgery have computers which “know” about my prescription, but automating the authorisation process up here in the wilds seems a challenge too far.
I don’t really mind too much, as it keeps me active and provides employment to van drivers, and I get to talk to people!
Last edited by LMcD; 06-10-24, 21:54.
Comment
-
-
This is really weird!
A letter addressed to The Resident arrived here yesterday from the Office for National Statistics selecting me, or rather the addressee, for an "important study" covering "a range of topics, including work, retirement, higher education, unemployment and looking after the family or home". I (the unnamed Resident) can get in touch with the interviewer online via a code which is given. The study asks "questions" - of what kind are not hinted in any way - "about everybody in the household, who must be kept in the picture. A £25 voucher is enclosed for a range of shopping outlets, with a further £25 offered on completion of the study.
Firstly, a link to how I was selected gives no information other than what the studies are and how and for what/whom in general terms they are used.
Secondly it was addressed to The Resident, not to me, so is that the consequence of some permissive lapse on my part that allowed the Council to hand on my email address to "affiliated organisations" I might be prepared to fill out questionnaires for, of which I have no memory?
Thirdly there is no "household" here - only me, assuming the definition of household to be a group of cohabiting people with a Head thereof.
Fourth, nowhere does it state in the letter that my involvement in the study is optional, not compulsory. What happens if I refuse?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostThis is really weird!
A letter addressed to The Resident arrived here yesterday from the Office for National Statistics selecting me, or rather the addressee, for an "important study" covering "a range of topics, including work, retirement, higher education, unemployment and looking after the family or home". I (the unnamed Resident) can get in touch with the interviewer online via a code which is given. The study asks "questions" - of what kind are not hinted in any way - "about everybody in the household, who must be kept in the picture. A £25 voucher is enclosed for a range of shopping outlets, with a further £25 offered on completion of the study.
Firstly, a link to how I was selected gives no information other than what the studies are and how and for what/whom in general terms they are used.
Secondly it was addressed to The Resident, not to me, so is that the consequence of some permissive lapse on my part that allowed the Council to hand on my email address to "affiliated organisations" I might be prepared to fill out questionnaires for, of which I have no memory?
Thirdly there is no "household" here - only me, assuming the definition of household to be a group of cohabiting people with a Head thereof.
Fourth, nowhere does it state in the letter that my involvement in the study is optional, not compulsory. What happens if I refuse?
At first I thought you meant a physical letter in which case "The Resident" is simply a way to get a response from a residence that fits the criteria for the study. If it was an online contact then yes I imagine that at some point you have indicated willingness, or not said no, to be contacted for such purposes - have you done such a study before? In the first case the council won't have been involved, in the second they won't have handed on your email address, but perhaps might have included the question in a communication, although I would have thought it a risky strategy for them.
Household can just mean the house or equivalent and its occupant/s, not necessarily a family or group of occupants, so it can be a single person household.
Comment
-
-
We had a spate of these absolutely pointless surveys (so bad that I actually wrote back and queried the premise of some of the questions, and got an email of thanks back), but we took the money (and in one instance a shopping bag), though I think it was only £10.
Have some fun: fill it in and respond as absurdly as you think fit to their ridiculous question!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostWe had a spate of these absolutely pointless surveys (so bad that I actually wrote back and queried the premise of some of the questions, and got an email of thanks back), but we took the money (and in one instance a shopping bag), though I think it was only £10.
Have some fun: fill it in and respond as absurdly as you think fit to their ridiculous question!"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostWe had a spate of these absolutely pointless surveys (so bad that I actually wrote back and queried the premise of some of the questions, and got an email of thanks back), but we took the money (and in one instance a shopping bag), though I think it was only £10.
Have some fun: fill it in and respond as absurdly as you think fit to their ridiculous question!
The shopping voucher was an email attachment and when I asked for a "real" one as I had no printer or smartphone I was met with rather an unpleasant reaction, even after I pointed out that there was no prior indication it would be a digital voucher. I did eventually get it some months later, when I had given up on it.
I did send on my concerns about how accurate the results would be given that my case wouldn't be the only one where the assumed employment model wasn't applicable, nor the only person to be unable to use a digital voucher, but didn't have a response beyond thanks for my feedback.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostThis is really weird!
A letter addressed to The Resident arrived here yesterday from the Office for National Statistics selecting me, or rather the addressee, for an "important study" covering "a range of topics, including work, retirement, higher education, unemployment and looking after the family or home". I (the unnamed Resident) can get in touch with the interviewer online via a code which is given. The study asks "questions" - of what kind are not hinted in any way - "about everybody in the household, who must be kept in the picture. A £25 voucher is enclosed for a range of shopping outlets, with a further £25 offered on completion of the study.
Firstly, a link to how I was selected gives no information other than what the studies are and how and for what/whom in general terms they are used.
Secondly it was addressed to The Resident, not to me, so is that the consequence of some permissive lapse on my part that allowed the Council to hand on my email address to "affiliated organisations" I might be prepared to fill out questionnaires for, of which I have no memory?
Thirdly there is no "household" here - only me, assuming the definition of household to be a group of cohabiting people with a Head thereof.
Fourth, nowhere does it state in the letter that my involvement in the study is optional, not compulsory. What happens if I refuse?
Comment
-
-
Article in today's Observer about empty schools : "The Rookhope primary school in Weardale, off the Northumberland coast..." - honestly!!
Why can't metropolitan journalists check their facts before writing this crap - Rookhope is in inland County Durham and is about 52km from the nearest point on the Northumberland Coast (Seaton Sluice) as the crow flies!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
I think it might be this?
At first I thought you meant a physical letter in which case "The Resident" is simply a way to get a response from a residence that fits the criteria for the study. If it was an online contact then yes I imagine that at some point you have indicated willingness, or not said no, to be contacted for such purposes - have you done such a study before? In the first case the council won't have been involved, in the second they won't have handed on your email address, but perhaps might have included the question in a communication, although I would have thought it a risky strategy for them.
Household can just mean the house or equivalent and its occupant/s, not necessarily a family or group of occupants, so it can be a single person household.
Comment
-
Comment