Originally posted by cloughie
View Post
May is nearly out and so is May
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
-
As for half-hearted, I have the impression that whatever JC had said or done the media would have used his eurosceptic past as a way of attempting to discredit his more recent more nuanced opinion, just as MrGG has done.
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostAs against the argument of those on the left who say that the EU consolidates worker rights and environmental protections that would be forfeited by a right-led British brexit, there were and are the counter-arguments that EU "fair competition" regulations rule out subsidising or nationalising ailing domestic industries; and in any case the EU had been moving increasingly towards a Thatcherite neoliberal economic agenda of privatisations etc
The European Parliament elections start today. But the body itself is an insult against democracy that exists only to rubber-stamp neoliberal rule.
This is the kind of thing that has always made me a "eurosceptic"! Even so, my money is still on Brexit not really happening. The only thing that's happened in the course of the process which has surprised me somewhat is the shift in the spectrum of opinion - while previously there was talk of a whole range of "hard" and "soft" Brexits, now it seems to be either no deal or no Brexit, and if that were the choice I'm sure JC would wholeheartedly agree with me that the latter is preferable.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostHere's a quite strongly worded article from a few weeks ago that you might be interested to read on the latter subject:
https://jacobinmag.com/2019/05/europ...antidemocratic
I prefer to look at what has actually been carried out by this profoundly undemocratic body, eg stupid laws to protect the environment, proposed crackdown on global tax avoidance schemes, financial support to poorer regions, help for disaster relief.
The 'ideal' of the combined strength of nations is to promote peace and in all ways to promote the interests of its citizens. It may have 'failed' in some ways (which ways?) but in what ways has it done the opposite?
Some of the objections in the article seems to me to be protesting about our … loss of sovereignty, as much as the lack of democracy, and to demand of the EU what we do not enjoy in our own country.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostI prefer to look at what has actually been carried out by this profoundly undemocratic body, eg stupid laws to protect the environment, proposed crackdown on global tax avoidance schemes, financial support to poorer regions, help for disaster relief.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostPresumably he campaigned remain on the grounds of pragmatism . And being a eurosceptic ( in my book) doesn't necessarily mean you have to pursue a policy to leave at any cost.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Postregardless of the not very relevant question of whether one or other member state is more or less democratic than the EU itself,
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Postit's a great deal easier to elect a national government with a commitment to expanding its commitment to democracy
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Postthan it would be to make the EU more democratic.
I see the two major - and immediate - problems facing the world at the moment as being (not the destruction of capitalism): 1) the climate emergency and 2) the rise in right-wing populist/nationalist climate crisis-denying governments. Both must be combated on a wider level, rather than focusing on electing a government which will, hopefully, bring a socialist regime to the UK. So what I have against Jeremy Corbyn is that he does not have a strong commitment to the environment or PR (nor does the Labour party. Yes to reform of the HoL, which would benefit Labour, um possibly to reform of the voting system which might not benefit Labour).
On this basis, I think that the two parties best placed to tackle the global problems are the two pro-EU groupings which, together (including the AP in NI), topped the recent poll in terms of the popular vote: the Greens - whose top priority is the climate crisis but who are of the progressive left and pro PR, and the 'liberals' for whom the climate crisis comes probably joint first with policies that seek equality, social justice and reforming the UK's broken democracy. And on that final point, they were punished in 2015 - not for failing in their attempted democratic reforms but in attempting to do so in the first place by entering what most thought an unsavoury alliance.
And if one is concerned about 'democracy', the obviously most 'democratic' result of the 2010 election would have been, not a coalition of a major and a minor party, but a joint administration between Labour and Conservatives. ROFL, as they say.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment