World Cup and Test Cricket 2019

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 12965

    #91
    I'm not.

    Comment

    • muzzer
      Full Member
      • Nov 2013
      • 1190

      #92
      Roy’s shot should be a dropping offence. It gave the game away, in both senses of the expression. He had played well until then, but it was an appalling lapse of judgment. Personally, I think Root is feeling the off stage pressure of Morgan’s triumph in the World Cup. I don’t rate Root as a captain. Jimmy A has been mismanaged, though granted he reported fit for the match, apparently. England are in danger of making a proper old horlicks of this series, only one game in.

      Smith is clearly going to have the series of the era, great for the crowds.

      Apparently Archer bowls spin, both right and left arm, during practice. All may not be lost!

      Comment

      • gradus
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 5606

        #93
        Michael Vaughan was right on the money when he predicted that England would have the greatest difficulty in scoring enough runs to beat a 150+ second innings lead.
        I agree about Roy, what on earth was he thinking?

        Comment

        • DracoM
          Host
          • Mar 2007
          • 12965

          #94
          He was just being Roy - I am not a fan.

          Comment

          • Belgrove
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 936

            #95
            Originally posted by muzzer View Post
            I don’t rate Root as a captain...
            I never have; he's pretty clueless when the going gets tough in the field, failing to ginger things up and create change. I think his position as captain should be examined at the end of the series irrespective of the outcome.

            So for Lord's the incomers should be Archer for Anderson, Leach for Ali (Smith's only apparent weakness is to left-arm spin), Curran who can also bat (space created by dropping Bairstow and giving the gloves to Buttler). Not entirely convinced by Burns despite his stalwart century, but they should stick with him and Roy, for who else is there?

            Starc will probably be playing in the next match, which will create additional headaches for the home side.

            Comment

            • antongould
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 8782

              #96
              Originally posted by Belgrove View Post
              I never have; he's pretty clueless when the going gets tough in the field, failing to ginger things up and create change. I think his position as captain should be examined at the end of the series irrespective of the outcome.

              So for Lord's the incomers should be Archer for Anderson, Leach for Ali (Smith's only apparent weakness is to left-arm spin), Curran who can also bat (space created by dropping Bairstow and giving the gloves to Buttler). Not entirely convinced by Burns despite his stalwart century, but they should stick with him and Roy, for who else is there?

              Starc will probably be playing in the next match, which will create additional headaches for the home side.
              I would drop Buttler and bring in Foakes as wicketkeeper and is there not a young opener at Essex called Cook .... ???

              Comment

              • DracoM
                Host
                • Mar 2007
                • 12965

                #97
                Yes, Foakes, Archer, Leach, and someone who can set a proper field and keeps thinking ahead - which Root notably does NOT.

                Comment

                • muzzer
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 1190

                  #98
                  Truly abysmal swish from Roy. Aussie will be loving this, with Denly to come.

                  Comment

                  • Stanfordian
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 9309

                    #99
                    Only the English could invent a game that is so depended on favourable weather and after five days can end in draw.

                    Comment

                    • muzzer
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 1190

                      Noted ;). But if this match, now only 4 days max, ends in a draw, as an England fan I’ll be relieved.

                      Comment

                      • vinteuil
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 12805

                        Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
                        Only the English could invent a game that is so depended on favourable weather and after five days can end in draw.
                        ... yes. But if you want a really slow 'game', it's Oxford. It can take many many years for a boat to reach the Head of the River in Eights or Torpids -


                        .


                        [ ... I see the last time my college was Head of the River was 1868 (Torpids) and 1884 (Eights). . ]


                        .

                        Comment

                        • LMcD
                          Full Member
                          • Sep 2017
                          • 8437

                          In understand that the Eton Wall Game often finishes scoreless.

                          Comment

                          • LeMartinPecheur
                            Full Member
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4717

                            Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
                            Only the English could invent a game that is so depended on favourable weather and after five days can end in draw.
                            Rules worth introducing for non-sporting international confrontations??
                            I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

                            Comment

                            • burning dog
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 1510

                              Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                              In understand that the Eton Wall Game often finishes scoreless.

                              .. but cricket never finishes scoreless. The very rare result in cricket is a tie which is what draws in football and rugby football really are. I'd have thought football would be the game that finishes scoreless most often.

                              Comment

                              • muzzer
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2013
                                • 1190

                                Back on topic ;) Today will determine how the rest of the series goes. If England can get a lead of 220 and declare mid-pm, then unleash Archer again, all bets are off.....IMHO he only really let rip after Smith had hit him for 4. There’s not enough time today for him to get 15 overs into a spell before that happens. But he’s the most exciting prospect to play for England in a decade.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X