Originally posted by doversoul1
View Post
New schedule: has *this* been discussed?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostFor me, Record Review WAS an 'entry point' programme since I learned so much about recordings and music. And yes, I usually was out on Saturday mornings so that left me perusing Radio Times to decide which 2 hours I most wanted to hear so I could set my electric plug timer to, hopefully, grab the chosen two hours on a fragile C120 cassette tape!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostFor me, Record Review WAS an 'entry point' programme since I learned so much about recordings and music. And yes, I usually was out on Saturday mornings so that left me perusing Radio Times to decide which 2 hours I most wanted to hear so I could set my electric plug timer to, hopefully, grab the chosen two hours on a fragile C120 cassette tape!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LezLee View PostI don’t know what it was supposed to achieve …
What I think might be the case is that as the various genres become more familiar, older audiences become more discriminating as they hear more, and gravitate towards the 'genres' that they enjoy most.
Result: any programme that aims to attract younger/'replenisher' listeners will have the classical music wrapped up in a mix of genres in the hope that new listeners will be attracted by the classical and move on to the more specialised. Unfortunately, there's no evidence (that I know of) that that is the way it generally works. If anything, they move on to more specialised genres which exclude classical music.
Meanwhile those who have already made their 'discriminatory' choices have less and less to listen to on *Radio* 3.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostWell, the controller has said: "The great thing about younger audiences is that their taste is not rigidly defined by genre. They discover music from all kinds of sources, and their ears are not put off by something that is unfamiliar."
What I think might be the case is that as the various genres become more familiar, older audiences become more discriminating as they hear more, and gravitate towards the 'genres' that they enjoy most.
Result: any programme that aims to attract younger/'replenisher' listeners will have the classical music wrapped up in a mix of genres in the hope that new listeners will be attracted by the classical and move on to the more specialised. Unfortunately, there's no evidence (that I know of) that that is the way it generally works. If anything, they move on to more specialised genres which exclude classical music.
Meanwhile those who have already made their 'discriminatory' choices have less and less to listen to on *Radio* 3.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostI hope that what was said about younger audiences and genres is true but I fear classical is a genre which is not part of their agenda and is largely absent from R1 2 & 6. Those stations should be the breeding grounds for broadening tastes, sadly they are not!
1) pull in new listeners (any content will do) and
2) then try to interest them in Radio 3's 'core proposition' (BBC Trust speak for classical music`).
If the station aims for 'the centre of the mass', people at both ends drop away; so they move further and further towards the easy listening popular. I don't have recent figures - and statistics can be complex to interpret - but if the average age of the Radio 3 audience has now risen to 60, the chances are that they aren't attracting the young. The 'replenisher' group (35-54) seems to be the easy listening audience fed up with CFM's commercials.
* NB 'broadening tastes' doesn't include classical music.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostThat is what FoR3 (i.e., in this case, me) have been telling the BBC for years and years. But the wider BBC doesn't want to know - they pursue the genres that bring in bigger audiences. Proms coverage gets diluted, reduced and shipped off to the sidelines of BBC FOUR and it's left to Radio 3 to somehow try to:
1) pull in new listeners (any content will do) and
2) then try to interest them in Radio 3's 'core proposition' (BBC Trust speak for classical music`).
If the station aims for 'the centre of the mass', people at both ends drop away; so they move further and further towards the easy listening popular. I don't have recent figures - and statistics can be complex to interpret - but if the average age of the Radio 3 audience has now risen to 60, the chances are that they aren't attracting the young. The 'replenisher' group (35-54) seems to be the easy listening audience fed up with CFM's commercials.
* NB 'broadening tastes' doesn't include classical music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostBroaden tastes on R1 2 & 6 exists minimally anywhere outside mainstream 80s and onwards pop. It is a disgrace!
Forgot reggae, rap, hip hop, trip hop ...It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostI was surprised when the (then) Director of Radio described R1 as having a wide range of music: garage, acid house, drum n bass, grunge, grime, pop ...
Forgot reggae, rap, hip hop, trip hop ...
.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by agingjb View PostExtracts, gushed over while being played. Who is it for?
I suspect that the presenter isn't quite the enthusiast for music of all kinds that she claimed in the repetitive trailers for "this classical life".
On the evidence, she would rather talk about music than listen to it.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... wot? no ars subtilior ???
Answer: Those capable (with the help of their teenage children) of subdividing contemporary pop regard "classical music" as a single genre.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostIf this is Jess Gillam we are discussing, I wonder how broad a taste and knowledge anybody can have at her age ?
I've not heard this yet BUT my only other comment, based on experience
is that
"Young people" DON'T have short attention spans for music
they might have a "short attention span" (along with other folks) for music presented in a context that doesn't invite listening and focus
BUT that is something else entirely
I recently did 5 gigs of "long form" performance with Carnatic singing, live electronics, field recordings and a Portuguese traditional singer to large audiences of about 120 folks including predominantly children under the age of 10. No-one seemed "bored" or expressed a desire for the music to be "packaged" in a different way. People sat/lay on the floor and listened and some went to sleep! Which, given that most of the content was lullabies, was entirely appropriate.
Comment
-
Comment