Originally posted by eighthobstruction
View Post
Does this constitute snobbery?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostNo - I don't think that is correct.
Of course if we consider another one "fish" - there is historical precedent for "fishes", though (sadly) I've not come across "sheeps".
(And then there's "Musics" ... )[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostYou might need to be a bit more specific about that. A good many choreographers have had a go at the Rite of Spring, for instance.
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostGood point
Thanks
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostReally? Not sure I agree.
I think that the majority of respondents to this thread have sided with the culturally ignorant lady out of a natural desire to take the side of the underdog. I think, if we're being honest with ourselves, we will all recognise Conchis' reaction as one which we would have felt in the same circumstances, as in "How can someone work in the arts and not heard of Kafka?"
Where I differ from Conchis is that my view is motivated by a sense of despair at the state of widespread ignorance in this country, rather than one of snobbery.
Since when did apparently not knowing anything about a particular subject or person make one 'culturally ignorant'?
Are we also saying that anybody working in the arts who hasn't heard of Kafka is unqualified to work in that field?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostOuch!
Since when did apparently not knowing anything about a particular subject or person make one 'culturally ignorant'?
Are we also saying that anybody working in the arts who hasn't heard of Kafka is unqualified to work in that field?
Comment
-
-
,,,,this woman is obviously one those people who regularly uses "it was surreal " ad hoc to describe certain situations....Kafkaesque - Dadaist - Daliesque - not at her disposal....Trump only has 3 or 4 adjectives of size and just puts very, very, very, or most, most, most before them....bong ching
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Conchis View PostYesterday, I worked with a woman in her late fifties who had never heard of Kafka.
I may be wrong (and probably am) but I found this absolutely horrifying, as well as embarrassing. Said woman does not lack formal education and is not a from a materially deprived background....but she had never heard of the Czech novelist, or of his works.
After learning this, I'm afraid I cold-shouldered her for the rest of the day. I just found it embarrassing to be in the same space as someone so casually ignorant.
Does this make me a snob and/or a 'bad person'?
The significance of her not being from a materially deprived background escapes me. I grew up in what, to put it mildly, I would describe as extremely modest circumstances (and can I just say what an honour it is to be able to converse in this way with my betters)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostNobody seems to be concerned about how the unfortunate lady felt to be in the same space as someone so casually arrogant. (I'm not sure how one is 'casually ignorant'....?)
The significance of her not being from a materially deprived background escapes me. I grew up in what, to put it mildly, I would describe as extremely modest circumstances (and can I just say what an honour it is to be able to converse in this way with my betters)bong ching
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostNobody seems to be concerned about how the unfortunate lady felt to be in the same space as someone so casually arrogant.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment