If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Oh, he could conduct Wagner well, for sure, and was said to be a personable retiring type. Nasty piece of work in terms of his social and political outlook, however.
I don't know much about RG. I may have steered clear of his recordings because he usually seems to do Wagner in English, which would not be my favoured way of listening to it.
On the other hand the scandal that Ida Haendel has not been made a Dame continues ...
Are you certain she hasn't turned it down? Not out of the question that she accepted a CBE but declined DBE (that's what Vanessa Redgrave did). Several people declined 'titles' but accepted other honours.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Oh, he could conduct Wagner well, for sure, and was said to be a personable retiring type. Nasty piece of work in terms of his social and political outlook, however.
By all accounts he wasn't nasty at all. Quite a nice chap. it seems. What are you talking about?
Oh, he could conduct Wagner well, for sure, and was said to be a personable retiring type. Nasty piece of work in terms of his social and political outlook, however.
I wasn't aware that RG had been mentioned in this year's New Year's Honours - but I think that this neatly sumarises the situation. He was a man with poisonously stupid and obnoxious political opinions; he was also a much-admired conductor of some of the greatest works ever written, played his part in the regeneration of Opera in Britain after the war - the success of Peter Grimes owed not a little to his efforts (and what he must have thought of Britten ... !) - and trained most of the best British singers in a vast range of repertoire. He was knighted for his Music work, not his foul socio-political attitude. Personally, I think that giving a knighthood to someone with such opinions isn't doing very much for the reputation of the Honours system - but I wasn't asked for my opinion in 1985, so ...
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
I don't think it's inaccurate to describe his "social and political outlook" as "nasty", though, is it?
Yes, I think it's inaccurate. He was misguided and wrong-headed rather than nasty. He was a total Germanophile and could not distinguish between right and wrong. The Third Riech and The Holocaust were nasty. Aspects of Sir Oswald Mosley's BUF were nasty (not all of it by any means).
Personally, I think that giving a knighthood to someone with such opinions isn't doing very much for the reputation of the Honours system - but I wasn't asked for my opinion in 1985, so ...
Does that not depend on the reasons as to why the honour was given? Do they also have to have politically correct views as well?
Bryn is a fan. Barbirollians doesn't understand Wagner - in his own words he says that he likes the music of Parsifal, but not the story!!!??? They are dividable??!!!
It's not about being a fan, it's about cowards venting on politically correct (acceptable) targets. You won't find any criticism of Anjem Choudary amongst the thousands of Bryn and Barbirollians posts because they are too damned scared to criticise a brown-face or a muslim! Part of the British disease, I'm afraid.
We didn't get through the Blitz with specimens like these two posters!!!
Bryn is a fan. Barbirollians doesn't understand Wagner - in his own words he says that he likes the music of Parsifal, but not the story!!!??? They are dividable??!!!
It's not about being a fan, it's about cowards venting on politically correct (acceptable) targets. You won't find any criticism of Anjem Choudary amongst the thousands of Bryn and Barbirollians posts because they are too damned scared to criticise a brown-face or a muslim! Part of the British disease, I'm afraid.
We didn't get through the Blitz with specimens like these two posters!!!
Beefy, oh Beefy, my music-loving, music-sharing friend... stop digging this hole, please...?
Bryn is a fan. Barbirollians doesn't understand Wagner - in his own words he says that he likes the music of Parsifal, but not the story!!!??? They are dividable??!!!
It's not about being a fan, it's about cowards venting on politically correct (acceptable) targets. You won't find any criticism of Anjem Choudary amongst the thousands of Bryn and Barbirollians posts because they are too damned scared to criticise a brown-face or a muslim! Part of the British disease, I'm afraid.
We didn't get through the Blitz with specimens like these two posters!!!
What a lot of ignorant twaddle. Point of information, I was active in opposition to al-Muhajiroun. from early 1986, i.e, in its infancy when it was operating around Wood Green. Chances are you were not even aware to its existance at that time.
Does that not depend on the reasons as to why the honour was given? Do they also have to have politically correct views as well?
But (and this is a genuine question, I don't know the answer) did not RG question the facts about the holocaust? And did he not continue in his support for Mosley after the War? If so, this is a rather different matter from "not having politically correct views" - to give a knighthood (a public and international statement of approval, after all) to someone who held such vews (if, I repeat, he indeed did) makes an ambiguous statement on official attitudes to the Holocaust, IMO. For me, his contributions to post-war British cultural life cannot outweigh such attitudes where such a significant Honour is concerned.
But, as I said, I wasn't consulted.
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
But (and this is a genuine question, I don't know the answer) did not RG question the facts about the holocaust? And did he not continue in his support for Mosley after the War? If so, this is a rather different matter from "not having politically correct views" - to give a knighthood (a public and international statement of approval, after all) to someone who held such vews (if, I repeat, he indeed did) makes an ambiguous statement on official attitudes to the Holocaust, IMO. For me, his contributions to post-war British cultural life cannot outweigh such attitudes where such a significant Honour is concerned.
Comment