Originally posted by french frank
View Post
Just to expand on what I think I mean: knowing where to distinguish harmless dislikes from harmful prejudices surely comprises in part being in possession of an informed way of thinking about things. I dislike certain manifestations of high Victorian architecture - St Pancras railway station hotel being a particular "bĂȘte orange" with me - seeing it as I do as equivalent to campness in representing a certain pretentiousness of display that is concealing of something deeper in the psyche. OK this may be a superficial comparison to make - gay camp was a way of communicating gender within its community and to a wider world of prejudice thought only to be accepting of gays as funny ha-ha rather than funny-peculiar people, and it's my problem if I find its manifestation in certain prominent TV hosts and comedians to be cringeworthy: indeed some might regard as an unsorted problem, though I'd take issue. High Victorian panache on the other hand seems to me to have concealed insecurities regarding Britain's role as the world's biggest empire behind a veneer of architectural bombast. Obviously the parallels are questionable if not farfetched, but I cite them as self-critical attempts to winkle out what may be ingredients in my make-up that are intelligeable at a meta-level.
Comment