What are the items you refuse to own on principle?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I used to think this was quite a good principle. But it ends up being pretty soul-less - it wd prevent you having objects which you knew were neither useful nor beautiful, BUT which had associations of significance, something a bit more important than 'objects of sentimental value'. I like having around me books which I shall never read again but which were important at various stages of my life - Jules Verne, Addison, Crabb Robinson, Stifter. The worm-casts of my existence.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostI wouldn't question the point that "objects of sentimental value" - or, in other words, things that have contributed to the development of a lively mind and to a fulfilling life - are precisely "beautiful" in the fullest sense of the word. I'd be astonished if anyone else did.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Postthey belonged to interesting family members, or were made / bodged by people we love.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... o, there are items of 'sentimental value' around the house here that are not beautiful at all - that are absolutely hideous. But they belonged to interesting family members, or were made / bodged by people we love. I can clearly see that they are not beautiful, I haven't lost my critical faculties - but I can look at them with wry affection.
.
Comment
-
-
Anything with the word 'smart' in its title.
Looking at some of the items on people's lists you can probably say if they live in a city or out in the sticks ! Out in the sticks, we need a freezer and a 4 x4 vehicle !Last edited by Anastasius; 06-10-18, 07:26.Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostAnything with the word 'smart' in its title.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gurnemanz View PostPoint taken. I prefer to use "smart" in the sense of "neat" or "fashionable". I would buy a smart shirt but might avoid a smart restaurant. In the informal US usage of "clever" it would be hard to put such a ban into practice if you want to own a newish mobile telephone or TV.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostAnything with the word 'smart' in its title.
It’s just **** H20, plus possibly some low level contaminants .... for ................ [expletive deleted]
Comment
-
Comment