"Modernism", "Elitism", and "The Working Classes"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bryn
    Banned
    • Mar 2007
    • 24688

    #31
    I wonder if anyone would consider Philip Glass's Akhnaten as modernist. I certainly don't, yet his use of no less than three ancient languages, in addition to the audience's vernacular, must surely render it even more 'obscurantist' than Stravinsky's Oedipus Rex.

    Comment

    • Mal
      Full Member
      • Dec 2016
      • 892

      #32
      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
      I wonder if anyone would consider Philip Glass's Akhnaten as modernist. I certainly don't, yet his use of no less than three ancient languages, in addition to the audience's vernacular, must surely render it even more 'obscurantist' than Stravinsky's Oedipus Rex.
      This guy does:

      "Philip Glass' Modernist Take On Ancient Egypt"



      Why would you not label it as modernist?

      Comment

      • Richard Barrett
        Guest
        • Jan 2016
        • 6259

        #33
        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
        I wonder if anyone would consider Philip Glass's Akhnaten as modernist. I certainly don't, yet his use of no less than three ancient languages, in addition to the audience's vernacular, must surely render it even more 'obscurantist' than Stravinsky's Oedipus Rex.
        I don't feel that "modernism" is a useful term anyway. Originally it seems to have meant something like those aspects of twentieth-century culture which represented some kind of break with what were seen as eternal verities such as tonality, figurative art, linear narratives and so on, even though none of them had been around for so very long in their nineteenth century forms. But of course history has a habit of continuing, and nowadays the idea that music and the other arts should be constantly renewed responses to their time and place and circumstances has lost out somewhat in favour of the "capitalist realism" mentioned upthread by S_A, which is exactly analogous to the (pseudo-)"socialist realism" promoted by Stalinist regimes in that it's an expression of fundamental(ist) ideological axioms which are always to be reinforced and never questioned. And "modernism" is nowadays more often bandied about as a label with which to situate any such questioning as outmoded and irrelevant.

        Comment

        • Bryn
          Banned
          • Mar 2007
          • 24688

          #34
          Originally posted by Mal View Post
          This guy does:

          "Philip Glass' Modernist Take On Ancient Egypt"



          Why would you not label it as modernist?
          I think Richard has got in and covered that one. I would just add that Glass's music is more usually regarded as a reaction against 'modernism'.

          Comment

          • Mal
            Full Member
            • Dec 2016
            • 892

            #35
            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
            ... your use of the word "Modernism", rather than coinciding with how that word is usually understood, is simply a shorthand for "Music/Art I don't like". The quotations you cite don't refer to Modernism, ...
            The paper I cite implies that Stravinsky's Oedipus Rex is a modernist work, for instance, there's a direct comparison with the Waste Land: "It follows that Oedipus Rex, like The Waste Land, offers us pre-decayed materials, flitters and rubble ...."

            Here's a Guardian article which states it explicitly, "One of the key modernist works, Oedipus Rex has rarely been absent from the repertory.":

            From Sophocles to Freud to Stravinsky, the Oedipus myth just won't lie down, says Tim Ashley.


            I don't label every work I don't like "modernist". For instance, I don't like Andrew Lloyd-Webber's works, and I certainly don't call them modernist.

            Comment

            • BBMmk2
              Late Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 20908

              #36
              Modernist with Stravinsky?
              Don’t cry for me
              I go where music was born

              J S Bach 1685-1750

              Comment

              • teamsaint
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 25294

                #37
                Originally posted by Mal View Post
                The paper I cite implies that Stravinsky's Oedipus Rex is a modernist work, for instance, there's a direct comparison with the Waste Land: "It follows that Oedipus Rex, like The Waste Land, offers us pre-decayed materials, flitters and rubble ...."

                Here's a Guardian article which states it explicitly, "One of the key modernist works, Oedipus Rex has rarely been absent from the repertory.":

                From Sophocles to Freud to Stravinsky, the Oedipus myth just won't lie down, says Tim Ashley.


                I don't label every work I don't like "modernist". For instance, I don't like Andrew Lloyd-Webber's works, and I certainly don't call them modernist.
                You dont want to believe everthing that Tim Ashley writes.
                I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                I am not a number, I am a free man.

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
                  Modernist with Stravinsky?
                  Indeed, and Schoenberg's "little Modernsky" satire should not be taken as a serious attribution of modernism to old Igor, either.

                  Comment

                  • Mal
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2016
                    • 892

                    #39
                    I like the Rite of Spring and it's modernist, according to Sarah Bakewell:

                    Sarah Bakewell: 100 years ago two new kinds of music caused mayhem at concerts. One, at least, can knock us sideways even today

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Mal View Post
                      I like the Rite of Spring and it's modernist, according to Sarah Bakewell:

                      https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...pring-alarming
                      The music is often cited, quite wrongly, as the source of the riot. It was the choreography rather than the music which caused the greater part of the ruckus. When performed as a concert work in London, a fairly short while after the ballet's premiere, it was well received. I have always heard it as greatly influenced by Stravinsky's hero, Tchaikovsky.

                      Comment

                      • Beef Oven!
                        Ex-member
                        • Sep 2013
                        • 18147

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                        I have always heard it as greatly influenced by Stravinsky's hero, Tchaikovsky.
                        Intriguing, Bryn. Can you say more?

                        Comment

                        • Bryn
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 24688

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
                          Intriguing, Bryn. Can you say more?
                          I cannot cite chapter and verse, it's an aural impression I got as a teen, listening in particular to the Pathetique and The Rite, and which has never left me. At the time I was quite unaware of Stravinsky's zeal for Tchaikovsky's muse.

                          Comment

                          • greenilex
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 1626

                            #43
                            May I humbly suggest that there is only one working class, to which we belong until we stop working and evaporate into thin air.

                            To be proud of not working is obnoxious.

                            Comment

                            • cloughie
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2011
                              • 22270

                              #44
                              Originally posted by greenilex View Post
                              May I humbly suggest that there is only one working class, to which we belong until we stop working and evaporate into thin air.

                              To be proud of not working is obnoxious.
                              You may humbly suggest what you wish and make as many sweeping statements as you wish. I’m retired - so, in your book obnoxious, greenilex! Hopefully I’m not in thin air just yet!

                              Comment

                              • greenilex
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 1626

                                #45
                                So am I - retired I mean - but I find myself working harder than ever, and only evaporating ever so slightly round the edges as yet.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X