One of the problems I have in recent years is that critics seem to find every performance wonderful - even if it wasn't. They seem to avoid constructive criticism. There was a time when it was very much the other way, even when they couldn't find any fault they would say something like "Mr Heifetz sounded a little tired." (1954 - R Festival Hall recital).
Good is NOT the word!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostThats something I have wondered for a while. Richard Barrett gave some useful reponses a while back,which I haven’t really followed up.
What dabbling in critical theory can do, ( as you know better than me) is open the eyes to the many possible ways there are to structure a response, and highlight that the kind of criticism that we are used to reading, for instance in the press, really is just one way of approaching a work.
Which doesn’t answer your question, I realise.
Anyway, this might be worth a read over a cuppa.....
( A PhD thesis “ Boulez’s Structuralist Aesthetics of Music”)
https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstr...1/fulltext.pdf
the irrational as an essential element of music
Abstract and Introduction are just about enough for me now. It’s been added to Favourite to read over a cuppa later.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Conchis View PostPraising someone as 'very professional' is an insidious way of saying they are 'just about adequate.' Not much different from saying they were 'workmanlike.'
The British excel at this kind of snivelly mean-spiritedness. Churlishness is, and always has been, Britain's principal export.
QEDI will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doversoul1 View PostBeginning theory has been helping students navigate through the thickets of literary and cultural theory for well over a decade now.
There is quite a lot of overlapping between literary and cultural studies. Is there any cross-reference that can be made between literary criticism and music criticism? I don’t mean reviews.
I think you could profitably apply deconstructive techniques to critical or review writing, but I'm not sure how much of an audience you'd get...
The Irrational may be a good starting point...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostI think you could profitably apply deconstructive techniques to critical or review writing, but I'm not sure how much of an audience you'd get...
And going back to what Bergonzi said, I would expect a majority of reviews to be broadly positive, even if the performance was less than perfect. And it's more interesting to be told, for example, what fresh insights were offered into a work than that there weren't any. That would give the reader something to take away from the review. I'm not sure what interest there is in just being told a particular performance was awful if one wasn't there not enjoying it.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostThe most musically applicable literary critical concept would seem to be intertext, for those passages in musical works which refer to, quote, adapt, vary, borrow (or steal ) from other works. Whether you would find a use for the term as opposed to those more mundane expressions is another matter....
I think you could profitably apply deconstructive techniques to critical or review writing, but I'm not sure how much of an audience you'd get...
The Irrational may be a good starting point...
Comment
-
Comment