The NEW Radio 3 Forum!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30652

    #31
    Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
    What do you mean, "back in the era" - are they not still en vogue?
    They are!!! I saw a pair this morning on a young person. But they are even more flared, which is why they're different from our day.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • jean
      Late member
      • Nov 2010
      • 7100

      #32
      Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
      ...are they not still en vogue?
      Again, not still.

      A crucial difference.

      Comment

      • Old Grumpy
        Full Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 3680

        #33
        Originally posted by jean View Post
        Again, not still.

        A crucial difference.
        I'm sure that Mrs G would submit that in terms of attire, I do not know the difference!

        OG

        Comment

        • Richard Tarleton

          #34
          Originally posted by jean View Post
          Again, not still.

          A crucial difference.


          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30652

            #35
            Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
            I'm sure that Mrs G would submit that in terms of attire, I do not know the difference!

            OG
            Well, ten years ago, young people wouldn't be seen dead in flares. 'Flares?' they would say, incredulously.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37995

              #36
              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              Well, ten years ago, young people wouldn't be seen dead in flares. 'Flares?' they would say, incredulously.
              Hated them. They made people look like they had elephantiasis, and whenver they walked about in them, they caused draughts. At least skirts cause the right sort of draughts!

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                #37
                They were called "flares" because wearing them was a form of sending out a distress signal.
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30652

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                  Hated them. They made people look like they had elephantiasis, and whenver they walked about in them, they caused draughts.
                  They no doubt became very exaggerated, but I think the gentle flare was quite elegant, much moreso than skinny jeans or the men's saggies that were already half way down to their knees.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37995

                    #39
                    Originally posted by french frank View Post
                    They no doubt became very exaggerated, but I think the gentle flare was quite elegant, much moreso than skinny jeans or the men's saggies that were already half way down to their knees.
                    I tried on some skinny jeans the other day, having seen not only women wearing them. I had blisters behind my knees afterwards!

                    Comment

                    • Richard Tarleton

                      #40
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      They no doubt became very exaggerated, but I think the gentle flare was quite elegant, much moreso than skinny jeans or the men's saggies that were already half way down to their knees.
                      I wasn't going to return to the subject, feeling guilty for inadertently raising it, but...at least flares had quite practical origins. Skinny jeans are an appalling fashion development, whether on skinny people or on the obese, which is increasingly the case....

                      I had two pairs of flares, in the early seventies....

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30652

                        #41
                        trousersrough navy blue serge bell-bottomed trousers with a flap-front button fastening. The trousers are unlined except for the upper part which has a lining in blue and white striped cotton. The owner's name is ink stamped onto the cotton lining at the back.


                        (Couldn't get your link to work)
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Richard Tarleton

                          #42
                          Thanks - dunno what happened there. They're the very devil to iron (naval section in CCF at school)

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X