Today we will get to know what some people in or working for tbe BBC get paid. I welcome this, but why should the information only be for one public service broadcaster, the BBC? Other organisations are publicly funded, and indeed, there isn't a huge technical barrier to knowing what highly paid people in private companies are paid, as their tax returns could be made public, as in several other countries. Also in the BBC case, it is not clear that the transparency also extends to executive staff - the headline news is that "stars" will have their pay made known. Transparency could extend over the whole of the organisation, and indeed through other organisations.
I don't believe that knowing what others get paid is necessarily such a bad thing as some scaremongers have suggested.
I have worked in countries where there is greater transparency than the UK - such as Sweden and California, and after the initial shock of finding that other people could know what each other were getting paid, most people just got on with things.
I should note also that both those areas are highly developed, with on average a higher standard of living than in the UK.
I hope this transparency will extend to other areas of UK life within a not too lengthy period.
I don't believe that knowing what others get paid is necessarily such a bad thing as some scaremongers have suggested.
I have worked in countries where there is greater transparency than the UK - such as Sweden and California, and after the initial shock of finding that other people could know what each other were getting paid, most people just got on with things.
I should note also that both those areas are highly developed, with on average a higher standard of living than in the UK.
I hope this transparency will extend to other areas of UK life within a not too lengthy period.
Comment