Test Cricket is Boring

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aeolium
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 3992

    #61
    where there is never a dull moment
    I'm a bit puzzled by this phrase 'never a dull moment'. I'd like to hear anyone propose a spectator sport, or indeed any spectacle, where no dull moment is ever experienced. Would you rather be in a state of permanent intense excitement? It'd be pretty tiring.

    Comment

    • PatrickOD

      #62
      I don't seem to be much good at irony, aeolium. I keep trying, but it always falls flat.

      However, if you substitute 'participating' for 'spectator' I think you'll find that dull moments are rare. And, yes, it can be pretty tiring. I'm still knackered after 18 holes on Friday.

      Comment

      • aeolium
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 3992

        #63
        Originally posted by PatrickOD View Post
        if you substitute 'participating' for 'spectator' I think you'll find that dull moments are rare. And, yes, it can be pretty tiring. I'm still knackered after 18 holes on Friday.
        I'm with you there, PatrickOD. And as someone who has played and enjoyed village cricket for many years, I can't imagine it being of any interest to a passing spectator.

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30456

          #64
          I was more puzzled by the phrase 'nothing happened'. Nothing happened?! Surely, at the very least, the ball went down the length of the pitch and ended up in the wicket-keeper's gloves? Then he would throw it to another fielder, perhaps silly mid-on, who would throw it back to the bowler, and he would rub it on his tummy or his thigh as he walked back to bowl again. You missed that bit out .
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • aeolium
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 3992

            #65
            And of course if the bowler 'threw' the ball, then the umpire would call 'No-ball!' Is PatrickOD a reliable witness here, I wonder?

            (ff, silly mid-on in my experience is only deployed for an extremely good bowler or an extremely bad batsman - too dangerous otherwise)

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30456

              #66
              Originally posted by aeolium View Post
              (ff, silly mid-on in my experience is only deployed for an extremely good bowler or an extremely bad batsman - too dangerous otherwise)
              Isn't that the origin of 'silly'?
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20572

                #67
                Oh. I don't know. With the body protection worn by some fielders, it's much easier to be brave/foolhardy. (Not that I'd want to stand there, even in a suit of armour )

                Comment

                • amateur51

                  #68
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  I was more puzzled by the phrase 'nothing happened'. Nothing happened?! Surely, at the very least, the ball went down the length of the pitch and ended up in the wicket-keeper's gloves? Then he would throw it to another fielder, perhaps silly mid-on, who would throw it back to the bowler, and he would rub it on his tummy or his thigh as he walked back to bowl again. You missed that bit out .
                  The anatomical area referred to many years ago by the incomparable John Arlott as 'the soft fleshy part where the leg joins the stomach'.

                  I heard him refer to this when the New Zealand opening batsman Glenn Turner had been pole-axed by a sharply rising deivery at pace into 'the soft fleshy part where the leg joins the stomach' by England fast bowler John Snow. The NZ physio popped out to tend to Turner with the smelling salts and after some judicious massage left the hapless Turner propped up on his bat to face Snow's next delivery. Arlott's commentary continued with a straight-faced 'So it's Snow to Turner, one ball left'

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30456

                    #69
                    Don't know what you're sniggering at, Am51. And let's not have the one about 'the bowler's Holding ...'

                    Just been looking up Wiki on Fielding (cricket): I liked the caption: "Alastair Cook of the England cricket team standing in a catching stance typical of a fieldsman in a silly catching position". Quite.

                    Hmmm. The link doesn't work. But it's Fielding (cricket) ...
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • amateur51

                      #70
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      Don't know what you're sniggering at, Am51. And let's not have the one about 'the bowler's Holding ...'

                      Just been looking up Wiki on Fielding (cricket): I liked the caption: "Alastair Cook of the England cricket team standing in a catching stance typical of a fieldsman in a silly catching position". Quite.
                      Oh there are dozens of 'em, ff.

                      Another classic Arlott : 'There's Edrich, standing legs slightly apart, waiting for the tickle up to fine leg'

                      Soooo much better than F1 which is all 'vrooom vroooom they're off, vroooooooooom, vroooooooom, vroooom it's over'

                      Comment

                      • PatrickOD

                        #71
                        Originally posted by aeolium View Post
                        Is PatrickOD a reliable witness here, I wonder?
                        You've got me there, aeolium. I'm stumped, out for a duck, felled by a googly.
                        I declare.

                        Comment

                        • scottycelt

                          #72
                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          I was more puzzled by the phrase 'nothing happened'. Nothing happened?! Surely, at the very least, the ball went down the length of the pitch and ended up in the wicket-keeper's gloves? Then he would throw it to another fielder, perhaps silly mid-on, who would throw it back to the bowler, and he would rub it on his tummy or his thigh as he walked back to bowl again. You missed that bit out .

                          And, quite extraordinarily, you also miss out the process of the bowler licking his fingers and spitting on the ball before he rubs it on his tummy and thigh ...

                          Don't you know anything about this absorbing and fascinating game ... ?

                          Comment

                          • antongould
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 8832

                            #73
                            Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                            Oh there are dozens of 'em, ff.

                            Another classic Arlott : 'There's Edrich, standing legs slightly apart, waiting for the tickle up to fine leg'

                            Soooo much better than F1 which is all 'vrooom vroooom they're off, vroooooooooom, vroooooooom, vroooom it's over'
                            "The bowler's Holding the batsman's Willey" the late Brian Johnson!

                            Comment

                            • cavatina

                              #74
                              Originally posted by aeolium View Post
                              I'm with you there, PatrickOD. And as someone who has played and enjoyed village cricket for many years, I can't imagine it being of any interest to a passing spectator.
                              Actually, it is: when the level of play is mediocre or worse, I always find it interesting to compare what I'm seeing to instructional videos from Terry Jenner, Shane Warne, etc. and try to spot what the locals are doing wrong. Even a bad game can teach you a lot if you have the right attitude.

                              Besides, in the States, you have to take what you can get...

                              Comment

                              • Panjandrum

                                #75
                                Originally posted by antongould View Post
                                "The bowler's Holding the batsman's Willey" the late Brian Johnson!
                                First time I've heard that one.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X