Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Arts in the UK post-Brexit
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostYou are aware, Fi, that Ferney is quoting an American Baseball Player, correct?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostI had merely wanted to point out the obvious light-hearted nature of the comment, as a counterweight to the rather testy and humourless response that it had received.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostSo everyone should be 'disadvantaged'? Does EU freedom of movement automatically ban other nations from migrating to EU countries? If the UK doesn't allow other migrants from outside the EU to come freely to the UK, isn't that a UK decision? EU freedom of movement does not simply allow people to move freely, it guarantees that such movement can be made with minimal regulations. Much like free movement between the nations of the UK.
What do you want - everyone to be able to move freely to and from the UK or no one to be allowed to do so?
A similar argument for the question of social integration: if some feel there are barriers (and the nature of the barriers need to be distinguished) to their enjoying the arts, no one should enjoy them? Or we all stay in our own little communities and enjoy them among ourselves?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View Post
I would like everyone, EU and non-EU citizens alike, to be treated equally according to the rules agreed.
Seems fair to me
What isn't fair is the way that the UK (for one) treats some people (usually ones with different coloured skin). BUT that's not really a problem with EU free movement.
But the original question is about ART
and for those who actually know about this (as opposed to those who just like to make stuff up !) the effects are clear and obvious
(still waiting for the list .... )
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostThe "rules agreed" are that those from counties in the EU (who pay a membership fee and pool resources and share responsibilities for a variety of things etc etc ) are able to travel and work in other countries who are also part of the same organisation. This doesn't exclude allowing those from other places to be able to move and work and earn etc but the gig is that you join the club and get the benefits of the reciprocal arrangements (healthcare, working rights etc etc)
Seems fair to me
What isn't fair is the way that the UK (for one) treats some people (usually ones with different coloured skin). BUT that's not really a problem with EU free movement.
Stick to things you understand and leave this subject alone.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostThe UK being tied to EU immigration rules means that white people benefit disproportionately compared to non-white people.
Stick to things you understand and leave this subject alone.
just 2 sentences and you manage to be both ignorant and offensive
how on earth do you manage it ?
You must have a special gift
Comment
-
-
Is this thread going to be "disappeared" as opposed to just locked when the heat of debate gets too hot to handle? (When one or two or more PM and complain - emoticon :swoon: :get smelling salts: )
This could become a mere memory -a thread that formerly existed.........
Edit - Just back from listening to our local orchestra (Shostakovich 1st Cello C and 5th Symphony). Posting my thoughts, for once rather prescient, given #134 posted seconds before mine. All that time invested in posting by contributors to the thread, to disappear in the click of a mouse !Last edited by Cockney Sparrow; 14-10-18, 08:59.
Comment
-
Comment