If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yes, the Coop has now started (along with, I imagine, most supermarkets) to stock packs of pea shoots which look like slightly lighter watercress. I read up on them in case they were just a middleclass fad, but it seems that young shoots have much more nutritional value because (I don't need to remember the exact reason as long as the source of info seems reliable). They also have a different, pea-like taste which makes a change from peppery rocket or watercress.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Yes, the Coop has now started (along with, I imagine, most supermarkets) to stock packs of pea shoots which look like slightly lighter watercress. I read up on them in case they were just a middleclass fad, but it seems that young shoots have much more nutritional value because (I don't need to remember the exact reason as long as the source of info seems reliable). They also have a different, pea-like taste which makes a change from peppery rocket or watercress.
I'll look out for them next time in Upper Norwood St Sprees - thanks!
Yes, the Coop has now started (along with, I imagine, most supermarkets) to stock packs of pea shoots which look like slightly lighter watercress. I read up on them in case they were just a middleclass fad, but it seems that young shoots have much more nutritional value because (I don't need to remember the exact reason as long as the source of info seems reliable). They also have a different, pea-like taste which makes a change from peppery rocket or watercress.
Morrisons have had them for yonks. They are certainly not middle class. Quite a strong taste. Reading up on food rather than just buying it and shoving it down yer gullet, might be middle class. Anyway, class and food is all topsy-turvy now. Back in the day, we only had polenta and butter when we were feeling the pinch and ox tail was slumming it. Although I suppose we can still point at people who buy broken biscuits and look down on them.
There are all sorts of reasons why people profess to be vegetarian, some of which make sense, some don't. But those who claim to be "strict vegetarians", I don't understand. If you're "strict" about it, you become a vegan. I was even (very briefly and for practical reasons only) a fruitarian. But now I eat what I like, moderately, and with concerns about the issues involved.
But you're probably right - they meant vegan.
I'm surprised that you seem to think that only vegans would be concerned by the use of animal by products. I'm no vegetarian (or vegan) but I dislike any cruelty or unnecessary harm to animals, particularly when there are other available alternative materials which could be used. I hope and trust that I am not alone in this view.
I'm surprised that you seem to think that only vegans would be concerned by the use of animal by products. I'm no vegetarian (or vegan) but I dislike any cruelty or unnecessary harm to animals, particularly when there are other available alternative materials which could be used. I hope and trust that I am not alone in this view.
Does it make no difference if the byproduct is taken from a dead animal - not slaughtered for this product? It does matter to 'strict' vegans, though less strict ones will wear leather shoes on the assumption that animals are not bred, raised and fed for their leather, and that the alternative would be to dispose of it when the animal has been slaughtered or even died naturally. Even less strict vegans have been known to buy leather shoes from secondhand/recycling businesses.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
I'm surprised that you seem to think that only vegans would be concerned by the use of animal by products. I'm no vegetarian (or vegan) but I dislike any cruelty or unnecessary harm to animals, particularly when there are other available alternative materials which could be used. I hope and trust that I am not alone in this view.
Doesn't killng them so that you can eat them cause them harm?
And then, what harm in using the byproducts of your carnivorous lusts?
So have I, as part of a voluntary project I'm involved with to mentor people who want to grow their own veg. I've developed various methods of growing them according to circumstance, and run demonstrations at events etc. The last one I did a few weeks ago proved somewhat challenging as the participants were dementia sufferers....
The flavour can be modified to a degree by controlling the amount of light the shoots get - a certain amount of etiolation makes for sweeter crisper shoots(which I personally prefer) which is useful for windowsill production in winter.
So have I, as part of a voluntary project I'm involved with to mentor people who want to grow their own veg. I've developed various methods of growing them according to circumstance, and run demonstrations at events etc. The last one I did a few weeks ago proved somewhat challenging as the participants were dementia sufferers....
The flavour can be modified to a degree by controlling the amount of light the shoots get - a certain amount of etiolation makes for sweeter crisper shoots(which I personally prefer) which is useful for windowsill production in winter.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Which is not the same for all meat production. The feed lots of North America are worlds away from pastured livestock. I believe that some at least of the calculations for anti-meat purposes have been based on the assumption that all animals are managed the same way for the production of meat, which they are not. There is the totally industrial at one end dependent on intensively grown feed stuffs(mostly unsuited to the animal in question), high water consumption,climate controlled housing, chemical interventions, toxic and problematic waste products, and at the other totally free range as part of a near natural process with low inputs.
Comment