Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
from Michael Gray, "Song and Dance Man lll - The Art of Bob Dylan", ch. 2 - Dylan and the Literary Tradition.
[Dylan] has chosen a medium we are unused to taking seriously: an inseparable mixture of music and words - and we grew up finding this a cheap and trivial formula. We should look beyond the Elizabethan age to the time when troubadours were an important part of our culture, when that culture was orally dominated and when sophisticated art was the same in kind as the heritage 'of the people'.
If Marshall McLuhan is right, if our electric technology is pushing us forward into another orally dominated age, then it shouldn't be surprising to find a serious artist once again at work in the medium Dylan has chosen. Nor can it astonish us that such an artist can have reforged the links between folk and sophisticated culture.
[Dylan] has chosen a medium we are unused to taking seriously: an inseparable mixture of music and words - and we grew up finding this a cheap and trivial formula. We should look beyond the Elizabethan age to the time when troubadours were an important part of our culture, when that culture was orally dominated and when sophisticated art was the same in kind as the heritage 'of the people'.
If Marshall McLuhan is right, if our electric technology is pushing us forward into another orally dominated age, then it shouldn't be surprising to find a serious artist once again at work in the medium Dylan has chosen. Nor can it astonish us that such an artist can have reforged the links between folk and sophisticated culture.
The idea that Dylan might not sell as a slim volume is to miss the point of what Dylan's art is? - it doesn't fit neatly into the pigeon-holes (Gray's expression) we are used to. (I think the Nobel citation gets it).
Comment