Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
151 Conductors Can't Be Wrong
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostPhew!
(I almost don't dare to ask if Krivine and Kuijken contributed. Very disappointed to see Brabbins and Volkov amongst the contributors.)
Which publication was responsible for this farce?
Encore phew!
I'd like to believe that so many sensible, intelligent conductors declined the BBC MM's invitations that the mag was forced to scrape a few 'maestro barrels'.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostIt's quite a shock to see:
Mahler 6 not featured; no Haydn; no Nielsen; no Vaughan Williams; only one Sibelius.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Stanfordian View PostExtremely predicable I think. The ‘Symphonie Fantastique’ and ‘Pastoral’ are everywhere at the moment. Sibelius’s Seventh did surprise me a little as I thought it would be the Second and Bruckner Ninth is absent. Although some way off I think the nearest English symphony would be Elgar's First.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostYes it was the lack of Mahler 6 which first struck me... and the paucity of Sibelius...
Not surprised by the strong showing by Brahms though, anton...
I'm not g surprised no Bax or RVW. No Elgar?Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
These silly surveys always fail to account for the fact that our preferred choices often change with age. For example, I used to have a fascination with Elgar's Second, obtaining every recorded version that I could and seeking out live performances. Although I still have great admiration for it, it would probably be a little further down a list than it was for me thirty years ago.
There are, of course, amazing works like the Eroica, but how do you compare it with, say, Shostakovich 8 ?
Comment
-
Comment