151 Conductors Can't Be Wrong

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Barrett
    Guest
    • Jan 2016
    • 6259

    #16
    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
    Opium, IIRC.
    Brilliant.

    Comment

    • Tony Halstead
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 1717

      #17
      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
      Phew!

      (I almost don't dare to ask if Krivine and Kuijken contributed. Very disappointed to see Brabbins and Volkov amongst the contributors.)

      Which publication was responsible for this farce?
      Thankfully, neither Krivine nor Kuijken contributed.
      Encore phew!
      I'd like to believe that so many sensible, intelligent conductors declined the BBC MM's invitations that the mag was forced to scrape a few 'maestro barrels'.

      Comment

      • Tony Halstead
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 1717

        #18
        Apologies for the oxymoron...

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          #19
          Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
          Brilliant.
          - repartee of the week
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #20
            Originally posted by Tony View Post
            Apologies for the oxymoron...
            Oh! Did he take part?
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • Stanfordian
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 9309

              #21
              Originally posted by Tony View Post
              It's quite a shock to see:
              Mahler 6 not featured; no Haydn; no Nielsen; no Vaughan Williams; only one Sibelius.
              Extremely predicable I think. The ‘Symphonie Fantastique’ and ‘Pastoral’ are everywhere at the moment. Sibelius’s Seventh did surprise me a little as I thought it would be the Second and Bruckner Ninth is absent. Although some way off I think the nearest English symphony would be Elgar's First.

              Comment

              • EdgeleyRob
                Guest
                • Nov 2010
                • 12180

                #22
                Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
                Extremely predicable I think. The ‘Symphonie Fantastique’ and ‘Pastoral’ are everywhere at the moment. Sibelius’s Seventh did surprise me a little as I thought it would be the Second and Bruckner Ninth is absent. Although some way off I think the nearest English symphony would be Elgar's First.
                Spotted your typos Stan,you put 'although some way off' and first instead of second

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
                  ... Although some way off I think the nearest English symphony would be Elgar's First.
                  Chosen by David Zinman, John Wilson, Mark Wigglesworth and Owain Arwel Hughes

                  Comment

                  • Vile Consort
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 696

                    #24
                    What a pity they couldn't ask the symphonies (or at least their respective composers) who the greatest conductors were.

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20570

                      #25
                      "151 conductors can't be wrong."

                      What an infantile statement!

                      As all 151 gave different answers, at least 150 must have been "wrong".

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                        Owain Arwel Hughes
                        Oh, he did.
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Petrushka
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 12242

                          #27
                          I don't get worked up about things like this. It's mildly diverting in a whimsical kind of way and not to be taken too seriously and ... well ... that's it really.
                          "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                          Comment

                          • BBMmk2
                            Late Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20908

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Caliban View Post
                            Yes it was the lack of Mahler 6 which first struck me... and the paucity of Sibelius...

                            Not surprised by the strong showing by Brahms though, anton...

                            I'm not g surprised no Bax or RVW. No Elgar?
                            Don’t cry for me
                            I go where music was born

                            J S Bach 1685-1750

                            Comment

                            • Ferretfancy
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 3487

                              #29
                              These silly surveys always fail to account for the fact that our preferred choices often change with age. For example, I used to have a fascination with Elgar's Second, obtaining every recorded version that I could and seeking out live performances. Although I still have great admiration for it, it would probably be a little further down a list than it was for me thirty years ago.

                              There are, of course, amazing works like the Eroica, but how do you compare it with, say, Shostakovich 8 ?

                              Comment

                              • antongould
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 8782

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                                "151 conductors can't be wrong."

                                What an infantile statement!

                                As all 151 gave different answers, at least 150 must have been "wrong".

                                Sorry E_A I will try harder in the Title Stakes in future .....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X