#29 richardfinegold, your para two seems to have answered the question. If the measurements have been taken and are the same, then the equipment hasnt changed, so it must be the listeners' ears adapting. From a practical point of view it makes no difference, because a difference is perceived, however it originates. I didnt press my local hifi expert on whether he thought it was a change in the equipment or the ears, but I got the impression he thought it was the equipment. He also commented that even cables need to burn in.
I take the point that there can be aspects of some phenomena that we dont yet recognise, or know how to measure, but I thought acoustic science has a pretty complete idea of the structure of sound? Anyway, I'm afraid enzymes are as unknowable to me sound waves, I'm not that sort of biologist. I worked on plant diseases and biological control of pests, if your geraniums are looking droopy I can probably help, but I know as little of their enzymes as I do of oscilliscopes.
I take the point that there can be aspects of some phenomena that we dont yet recognise, or know how to measure, but I thought acoustic science has a pretty complete idea of the structure of sound? Anyway, I'm afraid enzymes are as unknowable to me sound waves, I'm not that sort of biologist. I worked on plant diseases and biological control of pests, if your geraniums are looking droopy I can probably help, but I know as little of their enzymes as I do of oscilliscopes.
Comment