Originally posted by jean
View Post
Sad times
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by aeolium View Postand was a neo-Nazi, and had been so since at least the 1990s - when immigration concerns hardly figured in political debate.
If you look at the UKIP poster (the one they will try and hide now, you know the one here http://indy100.independent.co.uk/ima...27-1a0i9s8.jpg) you can see where the link and inspiration comes from.
Which ISN'T saying that everyone who wants to leave the EU is a racist bigot BUT if you dress up like a policeman don't be surprised when people call you "officer"
Comment
-
-
Iâm proposing (no doubt to some peopleâs dismay), and against my better judgement, to reopen the thread on the referendum debate (to be retitled: âReferendumâ) tomorrow. I would ask you to focus on the options: which issues weigh with you when coming to a decision, why you regard them as more important than others &c.
I spent most of yesterday sorting out complaints behind the scenes and justifying moderation decisions: I donât want to have to do that for the rest of the week because anger substitutes for argument when people are posting. And please donât resort to bad language or attack other members because of the views they express: it doesnât help. Not easy, but please try.
For now, can we leave the matter for another place?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostIâm proposing (no doubt to some peopleâs dismay), and against my better judgement, to reopen the thread on the referendum debate (to be retitled: âReferendumâ) tomorrow. I would ask you to focus on the options: which issues weigh with you when coming to a decision, why you regard them as more important than others &c.
I spent most of yesterday sorting out complaints behind the scenes and justifying moderation decisions: I donât want to have to do that for the rest of the week because anger substitutes for argument when people are posting. And please donât resort to bad language or attack other members because of the views they express: it doesnât help. Not easy, but please try.
For now, can we leave the matter for another place?
For one thing, for all the knockabout, there ain't much of a debate of any kind that's helping me finally come to a decision other than here.
If people (including me) could keep their outrage to themselves, it's only for another 5 days. After that, there'll be every reason to shut us up.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostIâm proposing (no doubt to some peopleâs dismay), and against my better judgement, to reopen the thread on the referendum debate (to be retitled: âReferendumâ) tomorrow. I would ask you to focus on the options: which issues weigh with you when coming to a decision, why you regard them as more important than others &c.
I spent most of yesterday sorting out complaints behind the scenes and justifying moderation decisions: I donât want to have to do that for the rest of the week because anger substitutes for argument when people are posting. And please donât resort to bad language or attack other members because of the views they express: it doesnât help. Not easy, but please try.
For now, can we leave the matter for another place?"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostFor that I would be most grateful, thanks ff.
For one thing, for all the knockabout, there ain't much of a debate of any kind that's helping me finally come to a decision other than here.
If people (including me) could keep their outrage to themselves, it's only for another 5 days. After that, there'll be every reason to shut us up.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostAmazing news that the Democrats are holding a sit-in in the House of Representatives, demanding a vote on two mild gun control motions. Also Amazing that it's being refused by the Speaker (a Republican, I think)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostI wonder what will happen if Trump gets elected President. Back to Wild West conditions, no doubt.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostBut this is as likely as Farage becoming prime minister last year, if not even less so - of course the media are making a big song and dance about it because Trump makes such good copy, but even if he weren't an egomaniacal lying buffoon, his strategy of relying almost completely on social media, public meetings and soundbites, which might have worked in the primaries, isn't going to pan out so well nationally - if the Republicans actually allow him to run as their candidate. So no worries there I think. Which means the USA will get a Republican president anyway, though for some reason she's running for the Democrats.
thanks Richard, I have just realised what it was that 3 years studying American History did to me....I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment