Something Strange

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flosshilde
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7988

    #91
    Are you sure that's the right figure? Allowing for immigration, there must be at least 2.5 million in Scotland alone.

    Comment

    • ahinton
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 16122

      #92
      Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
      Are you sure that's the right figure? Allowing for immigration, there must be at least 2.5 million in Scotland alone.
      It was a hastily quoted guesstimate and some 1,350 might be rather more accurate than 1,500, but the point that I was making nevertheless holds good, methinks.

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        #93
        Originally posted by ahinton View Post
        It was a hastily quoted guesstimate and some 1,350 might be rather more accurate than 1,500, but the point that I was making nevertheless holds good, methinks.
        Is there a differentiation between "Scots" and "Scottish" involved here?
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • ahinton
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 16122

          #94
          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
          Is there a differentiation between "Scots" and "Scottish" involved here?
          No! Just a guesstimate, that's all - the point being that the Scots / Scottish people constitute a vanishingly small proportion of global population but, whilst accordingly not the "norm" among humans in statistical terms, there's nothing "abnormal" about being a Scot / Scottish person per se...

          Abnormal people in Paradise? Abnormal person on the Shore? Abnormal fruit? Truth is more abnormal than fiction?

          Comment

          • Flosshilde
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7988

            #95
            Originally posted by ahinton View Post
            It was a hastily quoted guesstimate and some 1,350 might be rather more accurate than 1,500, but the point that I was making nevertheless holds good, methinks.
            Yes, the general point's fine, I was just questioning your actual numbers. Even the most exacting requirement for 'pure blood' must give a rather higher number than 1,500 - did you perhaps miss a few naughts of the end of it?

            Comment

            • P. G. Tipps
              Full Member
              • Jun 2014
              • 2978

              #96
              When I was at school I learned that there were around 5,000,000 Scots living in Scotland. I doubt it has changed much even in that long time.

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                #97
                Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                No! Just a guesstimate, that's all - the point being that the Scots / Scottish people constitute a vanishingly small proportion of global population but, whilst accordingly not the "norm" among humans in statistical terms, there's nothing "abnormal" about being a Scot / Scottish person per se...

                Abnormal people in Paradise? Abnormal person on the Shore? Abnormal fruit? Truth is more abnormal than fiction?
                But only one thousand, three hundred and fifty Scots in the whole world?! There's more than that just in Skipton!
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • vinteuil
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 12801

                  #98
                  ... I suspect Hinters meant 1 : 1350 in the world is Scotch/Scots/Schottische

                  Comment

                  • P. G. Tipps
                    Full Member
                    • Jun 2014
                    • 2978

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                    I'm afraid your reliance on dictionary definitions (some of which are very dubious, btw - I note you don't reference the particular dictionary you draw them from) has let you down again. There is a world of difference between 'norm' and 'normal'. It is normal to be homosexual, for example, but it might not be 'the norm' in the sense that everyone, or the majority of people,
                    is.
                    No, you are simply wrong. If homosexuality (once again your choice, not mine) is 'not the norm' it cannot possibly be described as 'normal' surely?

                    I haven't checked the latest official statistics which may well reveal that heterosexual marriage itself is increasingly becoming 'abnormal' compared to cohabitation. It certainly has been heading in that direction in recent times.

                    This is not a judgement on lifestyles simply statements of fact.

                    That is why dictionaries and definitions are so important. You assumed that I meant 'abnormal' in a derogatory sense when I simply employed the literal meaning of the word, ie "atypical".

                    I'm perfectly happy to use 'atypical' instead of 'abnormal' if you prefer?

                    Comment

                    • greenilex
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 1626

                      Can't help it. Just waiting for someone to mention leaven and lump...

                      Comment

                      • P. G. Tipps
                        Full Member
                        • Jun 2014
                        • 2978

                        #96

                        For the forum pedants I should amend that to read around 5,000,000 PEOPLE living in Scotland!

                        Phew ... one can't be too careful around here.

                        Comment

                        • MrGongGong
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 18357

                          Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
                          No, you are simply wrong. If homosexuality (once again your choice, not mine) is 'not the norm' it cannot possibly be described as 'normal' surely?
                          Only if you confuse the words "norm" and "normal"

                          Tebbit is "Norm" and Henry is "Normal"

                          That is why dictionaries and definitions are so important. You assumed that I meant 'abnormal' in a derogatory sense when I simply employed the literal meaning of the word, ie "atypical".

                          I'm perfectly happy to use 'atypical' instead of 'abnormal' if you prefer?
                          "abnormal" IS a derogatory expression regardless of what your dictionary says
                          don't be such a lubberwort

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                            ... I suspect Hinters meant 1 : 1350 in the world is Scotch/Scots/Schottische
                            Aha! That makes perfect sense!

                            (And "scotch" that is one part in 1350 water sounds about right, too.)
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • Flosshilde
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7988

                              Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
                              #96

                              For the forum pedants I should amend that to read around 5,000,000 PEOPLE living in Scotland!
                              Quite; not all of them Scottish by birth, which is why I suggested that 2.5 million were. I'm probably over-estimating the number of immigrants.

                              Comment

                              • Flosshilde
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 7988

                                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                                (And "scotch" that is one part in 1350 water sounds about right, too.)
                                Sounds like an almost homeopathic Scotch & water.
                                Last edited by Flosshilde; 04-05-16, 11:28. Reason: too many 'o's

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X