Are you sure that's the right figure? Allowing for immigration, there must be at least 2.5 million in Scotland alone.
Something Strange
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostAre you sure that's the right figure? Allowing for immigration, there must be at least 2.5 million in Scotland alone.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIt was a hastily quoted guesstimate and some 1,350 might be rather more accurate than 1,500, but the point that I was making nevertheless holds good, methinks.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostIs there a differentiation between "Scots" and "Scottish" involved here?
Abnormal people in Paradise? Abnormal person on the Shore? Abnormal fruit? Truth is more abnormal than fiction?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIt was a hastily quoted guesstimate and some 1,350 might be rather more accurate than 1,500, but the point that I was making nevertheless holds good, methinks.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostNo! Just a guesstimate, that's all - the point being that the Scots / Scottish people constitute a vanishingly small proportion of global population but, whilst accordingly not the "norm" among humans in statistical terms, there's nothing "abnormal" about being a Scot / Scottish person per se...
Abnormal people in Paradise? Abnormal person on the Shore? Abnormal fruit? Truth is more abnormal than fiction?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostI'm afraid your reliance on dictionary definitions (some of which are very dubious, btw - I note you don't reference the particular dictionary you draw them from) has let you down again. There is a world of difference between 'norm' and 'normal'. It is normal to be homosexual, for example, but it might not be 'the norm' in the sense that everyone, or the majority of people,
is.
I haven't checked the latest official statistics which may well reveal that heterosexual marriage itself is increasingly becoming 'abnormal' compared to cohabitation. It certainly has been heading in that direction in recent times.
This is not a judgement on lifestyles simply statements of fact.
That is why dictionaries and definitions are so important. You assumed that I meant 'abnormal' in a derogatory sense when I simply employed the literal meaning of the word, ie "atypical".
I'm perfectly happy to use 'atypical' instead of 'abnormal' if you prefer?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostNo, you are simply wrong. If homosexuality (once again your choice, not mine) is 'not the norm' it cannot possibly be described as 'normal' surely?
Tebbit is "Norm" and Henry is "Normal"
That is why dictionaries and definitions are so important. You assumed that I meant 'abnormal' in a derogatory sense when I simply employed the literal meaning of the word, ie "atypical".
I'm perfectly happy to use 'atypical' instead of 'abnormal' if you prefer?
don't be such a lubberwort
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post(And "scotch" that is one part in 1350 water sounds about right, too.)
Comment
-
Comment