Originally posted by umslopogaas
View Post
Things that time forgot.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by umslopogaas View PostI guess we are all of a certain age and remember the grocers shops of our childhood. I also recall the tubes on wires system for whizzing money and orders round shops, but am not sure where I saw it: possibly in Sainsburys in Cambridge in the late 1960s.
Oh, and here's a site listing various department stores which used the 'cash railway' system.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Postyou can get yer jolly old Vesta Paella on ... amazon ! Handy 7-pack for just over £3 a throw (I use the term advisedly).
Ditto yer actual Beef Curry and yer Chow Mein... And as for Butterscotch Angel Delight... (Talk about keeping up with the times - why, there's even a trendy-healthy No-Added Sugar Butterscotch Angel Delight these days !
Yer Vesta Beef was the first curry I ever tasted. But the Vesta dish I used to like most c. 1972 was their Beef Risotto - now that seems indeed to have vanished down the plug-hole of Time, per this thread...
Mind you, I did pick up a Vesta Beef Curry a few years back and it was vile - so, so salty
So perhaps it's a good thing I cannot disturb my fond Risotto memories..."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostFur coats - there must be hundreds of thousands in the wardrobes of Britain, surely they, the coats that is, should be put to some useful purpose?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostThe lingerie drawer often surprisingly empty, though.
[ ... down here we prefer 'all mouth and no trousers'. Well, I'm not sure that 'prefer' is perhaps the best word... ]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View Post[A pedant writes: It should be All mouth and trousers. Beware false analogy.]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostTrue - but the addition of the negative spoils the meaning.
All fur coat and no knickers (no better than she ought to be, as my great-aunts would say)
All hat and no cattle [US] (all talk with nothing to show for it)
All mouth and no trousers (all talk with nothing to show for it, taking 'trousers' as synechdoche for membrum virile)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... taking 'trousers' as synechdoche for membrum virile)
...One of the joys of language is that sometimes it is the little things that trigger the most intense debate. Such as one little word: "no". Or, more accurately, the difference between trousers and no trousers....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View Postthe trousers are indeed there, but there nothing in them.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment