Originally posted by Frances_iom
View Post
Broadly, What Parts of Radio are Still Quality?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by greenilex View PostMulti-tasking with iPad and radio is interesting. Do people find that the visual text wins over the auditory?
But photos etc always distract effectively...
But keeping a car on the road wins over the car radio.
So are we to assume that the process of driving is more about an application to visual text where strangely there is no text?
That is, when without question there is via the windscreen a lot of (moving) "photo"?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by greenilex View PostMulti-tasking with iPad and radio is interesting. Do people find that the visual text wins over the auditory?
But photos etc always distract effectively...
Comment
-
-
According to a (pacifist) friend of mine who is the father of a 13 year old boy, x box games on i-pod involve sound. They sign up with their mates and hear each others' voices on shoot 'em ups or can audibly overturn the computer football referee. This, the friend said, is likely to lead to considerable opinion being expressed about any application of the rules when his son ventures into a real football stadium. I suggested that more significantly it was wonderful preparation for the employment jungle. I do look forward to the day when forums involve sound. People speak about having lost the ability to write now that everything is typed. But I am struck by how voices these days are silent, literally, and having to be physically conveyed with the hands and shoulders. In earlier times, people actually spoke, listened or wondered so technology has systemically altered the natural way. Anyhow:
BBC Radio 3 - Through The Night
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by subcontrabass View PostHmm. Each to their own. All three of those programmes have me leaping for the "off" switch when I hear them start. The first two seem to me to be about 40 years past their "sell by" date.
Radio 4 Extra is grossly inferior to its predecessor Radio 7 - too many repeats of the bits of current Radio 4 that I try to avoid. Radio 7 (repeats of classic comedy and drama) had a much clearer identity and a much higher proportion of quality programmes.
Comment
-
-
'In Our Time' WAS good until Melvyn Bragg decided that the experts were a bit of a nuisance and began to intrude more and more, interrupting, re-stating at length what had already been said, and rudely shutting people up. Great shame.
Comment
-
-
And oddly, I love the last half hour 6.30 p.m.- 7 p.m. of R2!!
Simon Mayo has a terrific little team who clearly like each other and get on well, and it is full of little bits of info, traffic, humour, news and conducted at a really good pace.
A refuge from the appalling 6.30-7 'comedy' slot on R4?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostIf you think it's always appalling, you're missing some good stuff. John Finnemore's Double Acts occupied that very slot.
Radio 4E - News free service that in being so is essential to national security : certainly more so than any Government - Content variable but a very big yes to Hancock's Half Hour, Dad's Army and Round The Horne, preferably to be broadcast there weekly forever. Not against the Goons but they do need working on and with whenever the mind feels up to it.
R4 Actual - I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue, Just a Minute depending on the guests, Count Arthur Strong, Milton Jones, Tom Wrigglesworth, Dead Ringers but I did prefer Week Ending.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostIt can be somewhat crass. 2 such programmes per week would be more than sufficient. But at least there's something good on Radio 3 at this time.
Comment
-
Comment