Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben
View Post
DG German pressings were unfailingly better than those pressed in England. Part of the same Polygram group were Decca and Philips, both of which were better pressed in Holland than England....you mention Decca, I presume the less good ones were New Malden pressings.
New Malden (Decca's plant) also pressed Lyrita LPs - of the 130 odd titles produced I have 97 (the stereos started at SRCS 31 so only really 100). I bought all of Lyrita's remaining stock when they discontinued LPs, and so had a chance to compare Decca NM (New Malden...not Near Mint!!) pressings against the later remasterings and pressings by Nimbus (you can spot Nimbus pressings by the tiny lozenge on the 'dead wax'). The Nimbus are unfailingly better....this gave me the opportunity to replace the poor pressings I had with pristine ones - I advertised the rest in Gramophone and they were bought by a New York dealer who sold them for $80 each!
EMI Hayes pressings were usually poor - so much so that in the early 80s EMI switched their manufacture to Hamburg and experimented with the DMM (Direct Metal Mastering) process, producing some of the best sounding silent pressings ever. I have made a special collection of many of these....and I'm still adding to them!
All in all British pressings were poor compared with continental ones - you didn't mention RCA, many of which were pressed in either Hamburg (DMM eg Gold Seal reissues) or Rome, both better than British pressings.
Don't get me started on CD pressing quality!
Comment