Originally posted by french frank
View Post
2024's 'Portillo moment'
Collapse
X
-
It’s strikes me that the Truss moment was one that will live long in the memory of lovers of the human comedy and indeed democracy, What really scuppered her was the so called Turnip Taliban candidate - voted for by Conservative members disgruntled with her selection years ago. They have long memories in Norfolk.Last edited by Ein Heldenleben; 08-07-24, 13:11.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostIt’s strikes me that the Truss moment was one that will live long in the memory of lovers of the human comedy and indeed democracy, What really scuppered her was the so called Turnip Taliban candidate - voted for by Conservative members disgruntled with her selection years ago. They have long memories in Norfolk.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostIt’s strikes me that the Truss moment was one that will live long in the memory of lovers of the human comedy and indeed democracy, What really scuppered her was the so called Turnip Taliban candidate - voted for by Conservative members disgruntled with her selection years ago. They have long memories in Norfolk.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
The single transferable vote option.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Posthe disregarded the fact that under FPTP any tactical voting by the no-hope BNPers would mean he'd get their votes anyway - it just wouldn't be obvious.
(Not that I'm unhappy with the election outcome in itself!)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oliver sudden View Post
Probably quite happy to disregard it even if it were brought to his attention. Labour similarly this time around... there must have been a mountain ot tactical voting going on and even then they only managed a third of the vote. And converting that into two-thirds of the seats must be exactly the outcome they were hoping for when they didn't come out for STV in the 2011 referendum. ('No official party position', I'm told...)
(Not that I'm unhappy with the election outcome in itself!)
Perhaps people are starting to realize that, since no party that wins under our present voting system is going to change or abolish it, tactical voting is as good a way as any of using it to their advantage, and is better than not bothering to vote at all, an option chosen by almost two-fifths of the electorate this time round.Last edited by LMcD; 10-07-24, 09:05.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oliver sudden View Postthere must have been a mountain ot tactical voting going on and even then they only managed a third of the vote
But gaming the system is now called "voting efficiency" which Labour and the Lib Dems did very well. It's measured by the number of votes it takes to win a seat (divide total votes by total seats). I suspect Reform UK will have learnt a lesson for the future.
Originally posted by oliver sudden View PostAnd converting that into two-thirds of the seats must be exactly the outcome they were hoping for when they didn't come out for STV in the 2011 referendum. ('No official party position', I'm told...)It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post....I am almost certain that by the end of this parliament that there will be a new verb : to keir....(a cross between to steer and to veer)....
To veer to the left or to veer to the right'
(Flanders and Swann's 'Misalliance')
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostSTV wasn't actually on offer. It was AV or no change. Many people voted against it because they were persuaded by the argument that AV would be even worse than FPTP. AV isn't proportional but it does have similarities with the French system with two separate votes.
AV is sometimes called 'instant runoff' I think. The one advantage the French system has over that is the possibility of changing one's mind in between the 'rounds'!
AV is of course how the lower house works in Australia. One characteristic it has (I hesitate to call it an advantage) is that while you don't need to do this absurd thing called tactical voting, it doesn't automatically mean that a party with 5 or 10% approval across the board ends up with actual seats. (Even the proportional part of the German system has a 5% hurdle to keep the wackos out, although that obviously only works up to a certain point...)
Comment
-
Comment