After a scintillating Ashes series last year, this year’s home Test series, three matches each against the West Indies and Sri Lanka, is of a lower key. But it will (apparently) mark James Anderson’s retirement after the Lord’s Test in July. His 700 wicket haul will not be exceeded. I first saw him play for England in Australia in 2006, it is remarkable that he’s still playing 18 years on.
Rob Key is clearly thinking of England’s tour to Australia in 2025 through experimenting with the Kookaburra ball at the start of this domestic season, which resulted in a slew of draws in both divisions. Worth a try but English conditions, especially at the start of the season, don’t favour its use. We can expect further experimentation in reconfiguring England’s bowling attack in the coming months.
Of great concern is the latest (and rather cunning) ploy of the egregious ECB to ensure the success of the Hundred format by co-opting venues into becoming stakeholders by ‘gifting’ them a 51% ownership of the team they host. The phrase ‘stuffing their mouths with gold’ comes to mind. How this will affect those counties who are not venues is unclear. Rather than nurturing the game, the ECB is disrupting it by inventing a format no one asked for, sticking it at a prime time in the season to the detriment of every other format, and then inveigling the venues into ensuring it’s future. There is not room, or the demand, for two short match tournaments, indeed the Players Association have stated that the season is too congested and expressed fear for the player’s wellbeing. One can only hope that the counties act in unison, ditch the Hundred and use the ECB’s largesse to revitalise the T20 format, which the rest of the cricketing world plays. Needless to say, I have no confidence in the ECB.
Rob Key is clearly thinking of England’s tour to Australia in 2025 through experimenting with the Kookaburra ball at the start of this domestic season, which resulted in a slew of draws in both divisions. Worth a try but English conditions, especially at the start of the season, don’t favour its use. We can expect further experimentation in reconfiguring England’s bowling attack in the coming months.
Of great concern is the latest (and rather cunning) ploy of the egregious ECB to ensure the success of the Hundred format by co-opting venues into becoming stakeholders by ‘gifting’ them a 51% ownership of the team they host. The phrase ‘stuffing their mouths with gold’ comes to mind. How this will affect those counties who are not venues is unclear. Rather than nurturing the game, the ECB is disrupting it by inventing a format no one asked for, sticking it at a prime time in the season to the detriment of every other format, and then inveigling the venues into ensuring it’s future. There is not room, or the demand, for two short match tournaments, indeed the Players Association have stated that the season is too congested and expressed fear for the player’s wellbeing. One can only hope that the counties act in unison, ditch the Hundred and use the ECB’s largesse to revitalise the T20 format, which the rest of the cricketing world plays. Needless to say, I have no confidence in the ECB.
Comment