Originally posted by Serial_Apologist
View Post
Queen's Birthday Honours
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostTo begin with, I would question
a) where "the borders of the natural world" are,
b) who imposed them when, how and why (or how might they otherwsie have materialised) and
c) with what they border.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOh meet scotty part-way, MrGG.
It's "profound b*llocks".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostEh? To whom?(!)
And how in any case does a "border" pay rent in the first place?
The perplexity already occasioned by my reading Prof. Scruton's assertion is now exacerbated by your additional parameter here![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostThe perplexity already occasioned by my reading Prof. Scruton's assertion is now exacerbated by your additional parameter here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
So the closest we've got so far to an explanation of what this seeming platitudinous gibberish means is "it's simply a statement of profound wisdom".
Or do you Marxists term it 'solidarity'?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostHey, S_A introduced that adjective to this discussion.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostGood for him. This isn't a poetry competition, and as far as I can see the word "platitudinous" describes the phrase in question very well, as indeed it does your supposed explanation. Can you do any better?
Relax ... the world is not full of evil, platidunous thinkers like Sir Roger Scruton... maybe it might be a much more civilised and tolerant place if it were?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View PostRelax ... the world is not full of evil, platidunous thinkers like Sir Roger Scruton... maybe it might be a much more civilised and tolerant place if it were?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostNobody described him as "evil" (and surely that word is more appropriate to describe acts rather than people). Anyway: "Music addresses us from beyond the borders of the natural world" must be an aphorism that you find particularly meaningful but you seem unwilling for some reason to share that meaning with anyone else.
If you believe there is nothing beyond the natural world I can see what you are about but that has not been my experience in listening to music, I'm afraid. We just see and hear things differently, it seems.
You clearly don't understand Scruton's philosophy and there is no discredit in that.
Similarly, I cannot for the life of me understand yours, but I don't beat myself up over it.
Vive La Difference, Comrade!
Comment
-
Comment