FoR3 membership

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vinteuil
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 13065

    #16
    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
    At the risk of lighting Jean's fuse, how about a neologism, dicatrixial?

    ... assuming you meant 'dictatrixial' - why not?

    Third declension.


    nominative dictātrīx dictātrīcēs
    genitive dictātrīcis dictātrīcum
    dative dictātrīcī dictātrīcibus
    accusative dictātrīcem dictātrīcēs
    ablative dictātrīce dictātrīcibus
    vocative dictātrīx dictātrīcēs










    .
    Last edited by vinteuil; 26-05-15, 12:21. Reason: correcting accusative case

    Comment

    • Bryn
      Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 24688

      #17
      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      Who's doing what to whom, Bryn?
      Beats me.

      Comment

      • Bryn
        Banned
        • Mar 2007
        • 24688

        #18
        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
        ... assuming you meant 'dictatrixial' - why not?

        Third declension.

        Number Singular Plural
        nominative dictātrīx dictātrīcēs
        genitive dictātrīcis dictātrīcum
        dative dictātrīcī dictātrīcibus
        accusative dictātrīcem dictātrīcēs
        ablative dictātrīce dictātrīcibus
        vocative dictātrīx dictātrīcēs
        I did indeed. That's the trouble with spell checkers when dealing with neologisms. I can find dictatrixial in no English dictionary so far, nor indeed via Internet searches.

        Comment

        • jean
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7100

          #19
          The accusative singular is wrong in vinteuil's post #16, but has subtly corrected istelf when quoted in #18.

          I am not sure that retaining the x from the nominative when forming an adjective in -ialis is good practice, though. I'll have to think about it.

          Comment

          • Roehre

            #20
            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
            ... assuming you meant 'dictatrixial' - why not?

            Third declension.


            nominative dictātrīx dictātrīcēs
            genitive dictātrīcis dictātrīcum
            dative dictātrīcī dictātrīcibus
            accusative dictātrīce dictātrīcēs
            ablative dictātrīce dictātrīcibus
            vocative dictātrīx dictātrīcēs
            shouldn't that be dictātrīcis dictātricorum?

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30652

              #21
              Originally posted by Roehre View Post
              shouldn't that be dictātrīcis dictātricorum?
              Third declension?
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • jean
                Late member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7100

                #22
                Quite.

                Comment

                • Flosshilde
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 7988

                  #23
                  Originally posted by jean View Post
                  I am not sure that retaining the x from the nominative when forming an adjective in -ialis is good practice, though. I'll have to think about it.
                  It's all Greek to me.

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                    It's all Greek to me.
                    Ah yes, the lingua franca of ancient Rome.
                    Last edited by Bryn; 26-05-15, 11:49.

                    Comment

                    • Flosshilde
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 7988

                      #25

                      Comment

                      • Bryn
                        Banned
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 24688

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                        Typo now corrected.

                        Comment

                        • vinteuil
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 13065

                          #27
                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          The accusative singular is wrong in vinteuil's post #16, but has subtly corrected istelf when quoted in #18.

                          I am not sure that retaining the x from the nominative when forming an adjective in -ialis is good practice, though. I'll have to think about it.
                          ... my apologies - the m was dropped off by accident when I was trying - without success - to tabulate in tidier columns. The quote in #18 retains the original reading.

                          I think dictatricial wd be better - but await an imprimatur - or at least a nihil obstat - from Jean...

                          Comment

                          • mangerton
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 3346

                            #28
                            Is that the way (order) nouns are declined now? When I were a lad it was:

                            Nom
                            Voc
                            Acc
                            Gen
                            Dat
                            Abl

                            When did it change, and by whom was it changed? I ask purely out of interest, and for information.

                            Comment

                            • vinteuil
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 13065

                              #29
                              Originally posted by mangerton View Post
                              When I were a lad it was:

                              Nom Voc Acc Gen Dat Abl
                              .
                              ... ego autem.

                              I dunno if wiki helps -

                              "The Latin cases have usually been given in the order NOM-VOC-ACC-GEN-DAT-ABL in Britain and many Commonwealth countries since the publication of Hall Kennedy's Latin Primer (1866). This order reflects the tendencies of different cases to share similar endings . For a discussion of other sequences taught elsewhere, see Instruction in Latin.
                              However, some didactic approaches or schools teach it in the order NOM-GEN-DAT-ACC-VOC-ABL or NOM-GEN-DAT-ACC-ABL-VOC, the order used before the Latin Primer by Benjamin Hall Kennedy. This order is used in The School and University Eton Latin Grammar (1861), with the ablative case always cited last, and a similar one is used in grammars of Ancient Greek (except without the ablative case, which does not occur in Greek), and has been retained by some modern didactic approaches to allow comparison of Latin and Greek"

                              Comment

                              • jean
                                Late member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 7100

                                #30
                                Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                                I think dictatricial wd be better - but await an imprimatur - or at least a nihil obstat - from Jean...
                                I think so too, by cautious analogy.

                                Latin x is phonetically related to Greek Ξ, ξ (though its form is derived from Greek X). It may represent -cs- or -ks- or even -gs-.

                                When the x occurs in the nominative form of a noun, words derived from that noun tend to use the form found in the stem - thus Lucifer from lux, regal from rex, and legal from lex.

                                But there are so few of these feminine forms in -trix (for a woman who does something) in Classical Latin that I can't be absolutely sure what the corresponding adjective would be.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X