Did he really mean that - minimum wages?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ahinton
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 16123

    #46
    Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
    The 'unreal world' can be a veritable eye-opener, I do agree.

    According to Sky Arts 2 there will be a broadcast of a performance of Richard Strauss's Symphony No 64 at 07.00 this Sunday morning.
    One might argue that it serves you right for subscribing to Pie in the Sky Arts!...

    Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
    As a huge Strauss fan
    As indeed am I...

    Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
    I can't wait to hear all the other symphonies in this recently discovered sound world.
    Indeed!

    Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
    Who cares if it is 'unreal'.
    All those who, like you and I, would want to listen to them but find to their dismay that they are indeed unreal (and even the only two symphonies that Strauss actually did compose are little better than competent youthful dalliances with symphonic composition)...

    Comment

    • ahinton
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 16123

      #47
      Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
      Thanks for the info Barbi.
      Labours plans sound like a step in the right direction.
      One problem with any efforts, however sincere and well considered, to address the issues of rents and housing and other allied benefits is that, as long as some rental properties in very expensive areas (principally London) cost far more to rent that the maximum permissible housing benefit (which I seem to recall is somewhere in the region of £25,000 p.a.), the solutions will remain either elusive or partial; this means that properties whose rents exceed around £2,000 per month are of no use to those on housing benefit, whether or not they are also in work (as many such claimants are), yete people complain about fany priced properties being inhabited by the overly wealthy when no one could possibly afford to live in them, either as owner-occupiers or tenants, unless they are very wealthy!

      There's the additional issue that many people seem to see housing policies in respect of rentals, benefits, RTB and the rest as connected wholly and necessarily with those in respect of the provision of more housing and I'm not sure that this could always work in practice, much as both are of vital importance.

      Comment

      • jean
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7100

        #48
        Originally posted by ahinton View Post
        ...like you and I...



        The writer of the song had the excuse that he had to make it rhyme...

        Comment

        • Bryn
          Banned
          • Mar 2007
          • 24688

          #49
          Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
          No they aren't at all
          They have somewhere to live
          I 'desperately want to buy' a pair of Schoeps microphones, I really need your help.
          No, no. I am far more needy, buy them for me instead.

          As to housing association stock, did not much (possibly most) of it used to be council housing?

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            #50
            Yes it did.

            I think more than half of local councils handed over their entire stock of council housing to housing associations.

            They did this partly because they were having difficulty in maintaining it. Whether not wanting to have to sell it off was another motivation, I don't know.

            Comment

            • ahinton
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 16123

              #51
              Originally posted by jean View Post
              Yes it did.

              I think more than half of local councils handed over their entire stock of council housing to housing associations.

              They did this partly because they were having difficulty in maintaining it. Whether not wanting to have to sell it off was another motivation, I don't know.
              I don't suppose that it matters one way of the other in the long run, though. With or without Thatcher's RTB or the new one currently being proposed by the Tories for housing association properties, local authorities and housing associations own the properties that they rent out; with such ownership goes the responsibilities of repair and maintenance, insurance, management and administration and the rest which, when they're strapped for sufficient cash to meet those responsibilities in full in timely manner (either due to lack of sufficient national government handouts or increasing numbers of people on housing benefits and council tax reductions or bad invetments or any combination of these), they will naturally feel obliged to consider selling some of those properties off in order to try to balance their own books.

              Comment

              • MrGongGong
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 18357

                #52
                Don't rightly know!!
                Finishing the score

                Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
                Even I hadn't quite realised that to understand and point out the difference between 'reality' and 'fantasy'
                Reality



                Fantasy



                This is also fantasy

                Comment

                • P. G. Tipps
                  Full Member
                  • Jun 2014
                  • 2978

                  #53
                  Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                  One might argue that it serves you right for subscribing to Pie in the Sky Arts!.....
                  Oh your own 'paucity of knowledge', ahinton!

                  The subscription thing seems to have long died a death, at least any time I have watched the channel(s) and I certainly wouldn't pay for much of the 'non-serious' fare that's on offer, that's for sure!

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30652

                    #54
                    Please note that Politics is a banned subject on this forum . If I decide that this thread should be closed, please don't just start another one on another aspect of the election, the parties, politicians &c &c.

                    This is a general (i.e. not specific to this thread, this forum, or members of this forum) explanation of 'the right to free speech':

                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • MrGongGong
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 18357

                      #55


                      La la la la la

                      Comment

                      • ahinton
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 16123

                        #56
                        Originally posted by P. G. Tipps View Post
                        Oh your own 'paucity of knowledge', ahinton!

                        The subscription thing seems to have long died a death, at least any time I have watched the channel(s) and I certainly wouldn't pay for much of the 'non-serious' fare that's on offer, that's for sure!
                        By "subscribing to" I meant "patronising", or even simply "using", not that you're necessarily paying for the dubious privilege...

                        Comment

                        • ahinton
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 16123

                          #57
                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          Please note that Politics is a banned subject on this forum . If I decide that this thread should be closed, please don't just start another one on another aspect of the election, the parties, politicians &c &c.

                          This is a general (i.e. not specific to this thread, this forum, or members of this forum) explanation of 'the right to free speech':

                          ...yet you have not only sanctioned but also contributed to a thread about what the UK Prime Minister did or did not mean by his recent public comments about the minimum wage and how, when and whether it will be taxed, which is hardly a topic that can be fruitfully discussed without reference to politics, wouldn't you say?(!)...
                          Last edited by ahinton; 15-04-15, 12:19.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30652

                            #58
                            Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                            ...yet you have not only sanctioned but also contributed to a thead about what the UK Prime Minister did or did not mean by his recent public comments about the minimum wage and how, when and whether it will be taxed, which is hardly a topic that can be fruitfully discussed without reference to politics, wouldn't you say?(!)...
                            I didn't 'sanction' it - I have better things to do than read every single 'thead' on the forum.

                            The message is: Please, as on many other forums, no politics.
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • Dave2002
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 18061

                              #59
                              ff

                              Sorry if this has caused a problem.

                              Is there anywhere we can discuss the forthcoming election rationally?

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30652

                                #60
                                Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                                Is there anywhere we can discuss the forthcoming election rationally?
                                How about: http://vote-2012.proboards.com/board...al-uk-politics ? I haven't read any of the discussions, so you may have to be more disciplined than here!

                                (2015 seems already to be up to p 181 )
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X