Originally posted by Anastasius
View Post
bye bye, Nimrud, bye bye
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostI suppose the idea of actively preserving the past is a comparatively recent one (Victorian ?) - previously we seemed to be quite happy for buildings to gently fall into decay, some of Henry VIII's palaces were ruins within fifty years of being built.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostI'm sure we don't. And am happy for it to be left to posterity (rather than ideology) to decide what survives and what doesn't.
I don't think it's arrogance to hope or want one's work to survive longer than 'l'espace d'un matin'.
It might be a good idea to keep a few representative examples, but not necessarily whole blocks of poor quality houses.
Other examples which have gone wrong though are (1) parts of Stockholm - about which I know fairly little, but apparently the city council made a value judgement that some parts were of little historical value in the 1960s, and had them razed - and now people seem to think that was a really bad idea, and there is also (2) Leipzig city council which blasted one of the churches which Bach had been responsible for - heaven knows why! It had only been there for around 1000 years.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostIs there indeed? (although "much" should surely read "many" if indeed it's to be read at all?) Do you know who funds and runs this school? It sounds even worse than the much better known Viennese Secondary School...Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostIt might be a good idea to keep a few representative examples, but not necessarily whole blocks of poor quality houses.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostIt might be a good idea to keep a few representative examples, but not necessarily whole blocks of poor quality houses.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostI don't know whether this is relevant but apparently the Palace of Westminster needs £3billion+ spent on it in repairs - is that money that could be better spent perhaps bulldozing Barry's Gothic and letting a young architect be uninhibitively (uninhibitedly?) creative ?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Richard Barrett
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostBuckingham Palace can also go while they are at it
I do think humanity is diminished by the destruction of ancient sites carried out by IS. Not of course anything like as much as it is diminished by their brutality against human beings. And let's not forget that elsewhere in Iraq, ancient Mesopotamian sites were levelled by the US Army twelve years ago to act as helicopter landing areas.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostI don't think it's muddled.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostI do think humanity is diminished by the destruction of ancient sites carried out by IS. Not of course anything like as much as it is diminished by their brutality against human beings. And let's not forget that elsewhere in Iraq, ancient Mesopotamian sites were levelled by the US Army twelve years ago to act as helicopter landing areas.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DracoM View PostFully accept and loathe the nastiness outlined, but might the difference be that ISIS / -al-Shabab / Boko Haram et al specifically and quite deliberately and systematically single out non-Muslims to massacre. Not sure even the appalling Crusaders murdered all Jews, or all Muslims they came across, did they? ISIS apparently do, but can allow converts to live.
Comment
-
Comment