Originally posted by Beef Oven!
View Post
Retirement
Collapse
X
-
I don't think I've contributed to this thread yet. Although of retirement age, I'm continuing to work; fortunately I'm able to do so. Yesterday I received a letter from a pension administrator relating to a small pension from a company I worked for many years ago. It (the letter, but thinking about it, so was the company) was a shambles. I phoned the administrator this morning, and said, "I'd take Option 2 like a shot, but I don't think that's what you meant."
Them (after a long pause): "Errm.... no. We'll look into this, and send you another letter."
Me: "I can see why Private Eye call you what they do."
Still, on the bright side, miss m announced her engagement this morning, so my retirement has been deferred by a further five to ten years.
Comment
-
-
I think the thread title might be better with a question mark.
Lets hope MPs, unions, and pensioner pressure groups rally round to stop yet another attack on workers.
Plenty of money, if the will is there to spend it properly. The country has never created more wealth, never had more people in work.Last edited by teamsaint; 23-03-17, 08:03.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
The thing which annoys me (and did so in spades about the appalling rise in women's pension age a few years ago) is that a contract is broken. Whether it is written or implicit, one expects that the taxes and NI contributions one begins paying at age 18, 21 or whatever will result in a State Pension at a specified age. Mrs A. was lucky in that she just sneaked into the 'retirement at 60' cohort. Friends a few years younger have to wait another 5 years.
When the government (any government) does a statistical projection about the number of retired people in x years' time, its immediate solution is to increase the retirement age to fit the 'pot' of money available. As Teamsaint suggested above, it's the flippin' pot that needs to be increased...by taxing the wealthier part of the nation...who will be receiving comfy occupational pensions AT THE EXPECTED AGE anyway.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostWhen the government (any government) does a statistical projection about the number of retired people in x years' time, its immediate solution is to increase the retirement age to fit the 'pot' of money available. As Teamsaint suggested above, it's the flippin' pot that needs to be increased...by taxing the wealthier part of the nation...who will be receiving comfy occupational pensions AT THE EXPECTED AGE anyway.
Re increasing the size of the pot - there is an issue about whether it's really up to the government or any public body to provide pensions. Administration of pensions in the private sector seems haphazard, with some very poor pension arrangements (nasty capitalist bosses raiding pension funds) though some private sectore pensions may be good. Many public sector workers don't get paid too much, but do get a somewhat more reliable pension. However there are many private sector or self employed workers who also don't get paid much, and some of these may have real problems as they approach retirement.
There are some big social issues behind this - and I can't solve them. Neither, it seems, can anybody else.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostAre you retiring completely?Originally posted by Caliban View Post
Then there is a particular thing I could do a few times a month from next year on a freelance basis (at a couple of organisations encountered via work) if so inclined.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
Comment