This suggests Melvyn may have got in a rut after so many years, perhaps too set in his ways to change. Think of Patrick Moore.
Controller, BBC Radio 3
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostThis suggests Melvyn may have got in a rut after so many years, perhaps too set in his ways to change. Think of Patrick Moore.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostNo, of course it doesn't. But the difference lies in the individual's reaction: for me, there isn't enough left of what I valued to make Radio 3 a 'radio station': it's just occasional programmes or items which don't make Radio 3 of enough general interest to bother with. I have other interests. I don't want background listening at all: I prefer silence - but that's just me. But my feelings and the feelings of listeners like me were the incentive for setting up FoR3 - and later this forum - 20 odd years ago. It's disheartening to find people are forgetting that, shrugging and putting up with things - or never knew about them in the first place.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Hitch View PostFF, would it be asking too much if I wished for a sticky post in which you explained what it is you want to see return to R3?
I would characterise what we argued for as a lightly updated version of the Third/early years of R3: the same genres of classical music, jazz, features and talks on contemporary topics of interest to a general (R3) audience. We included world music too when that was introduced. But a key factor was how everythings was geared to R3 listeners, not "What do we have to broadcast and how do we broadcast it to appeal to a new kind of listener who doesn't necessarily want what's currently on offer." In other words, we weren't arguing for anything very revolutionary but the BBC had its own aims and agenda. By the time we got to Tearjerker, Downtime Symphony, Unclassified, This Classical Life, Classical Fix et al the battle was over.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostIt seems to me that the opinions canvassed by the journalist writing this are a pretty fair summary of opinions on this forum - a desire for more substantial fare in the morning for example.
I wonder(ed) who she is and where/how she gleaned the information.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostYes.
I wonder(ed) who she is and where/how she gleaned the information.
Like smittims, I'll wait to see what direction SJ takes: it's one thing to complain about R3 'aping' CFM when you work for CFM. Not necessarily seen in that light if you work for R3. But how could anyone write: "They [R3 devotees] see big bands, musicals and swing as the remit of Classic FM, Scala and even Radio 2." These 'they' may see such music as the remit of R2, definitely NOT CFM. Nor Scala. CFM is much too purist!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostYes.
I wonder(ed) who she is and where/how she gleaned the information.
Comment
-
Comment