A few weeks ago I was concerned that if our garden's big beech trees came quickly into leaf after the warmish winter, they might get blown down by a late equinoctial gale - we were having quite a few at the time down here in Cornwall.
It hasn't happened so far, but in watching the advance of green shoots on trees this year I've been asking myself a question that hadn't occurred to me before: Why do small trees get their leaves so much earlier than full-grown ones?
My wife thinks it's purely an effect of gravity: sap taking longer to rise all the way up a big tree. But I've been wondering if trees have 'learnt' that they take a big risk by having too many leaves too early, and have therefore evolved some mechanism whereby they come into leaf later as they get bigger.
A tiny detail that I think may support the latter hypothesis is that I don't actually see much evidence that a big tree's lower branches come into leaf before the very top ones, which surely ought to be the case if it's all down to gravity.
It hasn't happened so far, but in watching the advance of green shoots on trees this year I've been asking myself a question that hadn't occurred to me before: Why do small trees get their leaves so much earlier than full-grown ones?
My wife thinks it's purely an effect of gravity: sap taking longer to rise all the way up a big tree. But I've been wondering if trees have 'learnt' that they take a big risk by having too many leaves too early, and have therefore evolved some mechanism whereby they come into leaf later as they get bigger.
A tiny detail that I think may support the latter hypothesis is that I don't actually see much evidence that a big tree's lower branches come into leaf before the very top ones, which surely ought to be the case if it's all down to gravity.
Comment