Sorry for the intrusion - and Happy '13 jazzers - but I found Paul Morley's essay on jazz on R4 New Year's Morn erudite and very interesting - whether he's right or not I have no idea. And for someone with little knowledge on the subject I felt I'd learned something and I liked Morley's approach. Actually I'd like to hear him do a bit more on the subject.
Jazz is dead...or is it?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BLUESNIK'S REVOX View PostAnd rule of sociological thumb...ignore any journalistic hype about anything tagged, "the death of..."
BN.
The point seemed to be that jazz had moved so fast through the late 40s to the late 60s that it now struggles about where it's going now and whether it has a purpose. That may not be important and certainly Morley did not suggest in any way that it detract from the legacy of the music, but that jazz players nowadays have a completely different background, life experience from Hawkins, Davis, Monk that the music struggled to fit the mix of the classic jazz with the now. Has it become preservation of the past at the expense of pushing new boundaries? For me it asked some interesting questions - whether it provided answers is another thing.
Comment
-
-
Lateralthinking1
Last edited by Guest; 03-01-13, 02:24.
Comment
-
Will have to listen to Paul Morley when I have a liitle time.
However I prefer to think that Jazz, and many other forms of music are entering a consolidation or equalisation phase (certainly that is true of my ears).
There has been so much ground-breaking revolution over the past few decades, that I doubt whether there is any ground left to break.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Oddball View PostWill have to listen to Paul Morley when I have a liitle time.
However I prefer to think that Jazz, and many other forms of music are entering a consolidation or equalisation phase (certainly that is true of my ears).
There has been so much ground-breaking revolution over the past few decades, that I doubt whether there is any ground left to break.
Comment
-
Comment