If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What I want to say is that there are plenty of jazz singers around today who are totally relevent to the contemporary scene and who are producing a body of work that is as impressive as instrumentalists were producing in jazz during the 50's and 60's. The notion that jazz singing is inferior to other types of jazz or than it is commercial and / or lazy no longer applies when youstart to listen to what is actually being performed as opposed to what is played ona station like Jazz FM - which itself is more likely to play Anita Baker, Sade and Erykah Badu.
Ian's comments as usual are very discerning and informative.
For me, singing, whether it is Jazz (Ella) ,Blues (Witherspoon), Gospel, Pop (Sinatra, Franklin, Dione Warwick), Classical Lieder (Mutter), or Grand Opera (Netrebko, Monarcha), is a class of music separate and distinct from instrumental music. Singers can easily bridge the different type of genres, since we are listening for subtleties and human emotion in the voice, rather than adherence to any particular notion of musical form. Therefore Ella is equally at home in singing standards or Jazz - actually I prefer her singing standards. Sinatra is nothing but a popular crooner, but he is very much at home in a Jazz environment.
So as regards the current batch of singers, I tend to look at voice quality rather than familiarity with Jazz form. So I prefer for example Gregory Porter to Kurt Elling. I'm quite happy with Esperanza Spaulding going down a popular route - her voice has not changed.
But Anita Baker, Nina Simone, Abbie Lincoln - yum yum!
There was a JoeLeanin' on the back doorA couple Jills with their eyes on a couple billsTheir eyes was statin'They was waitin'To get their hands on some easy ...
Comment