Gwilym Simcock at St James's Piccadilly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37876

    Gwilym Simcock at St James's Piccadilly

    As in the past, several of the freebie jazz performances being presented at this year's London Jazz Festival measure up will against the pricey items prominenced at South Bank. Today's gig, an hour's worth of the much-lauded Gwilym Simcock was no exception. One or two tracks from his latest release have figured on various radio programmes of late, and what was on offer consisted mostly, I guess , of these materials.

    Arriving as I did two minutes late - for which I and others were directed up to the gallery, and made to wait until the end of the first number - some allowance had to be made for echoey acoustics giving the impression, erroneous or not was hard to tell, of excessive use of the sustain pedal. The technique is less accentuated than the way jazz customarily expresses its soul through the concert techniques it finds useful to itself. That said, there is no doubting Mr Simcock's virtuosity - a fluency immediately comparable in my mind to the great, late Gordon Beck, who seems now to represent Gwilym's nearest predecessor in bringing additional panache to a stylistic tradition represented by such well known figures as Chick Corea (who is said to greatly admire him) and Keith Jarrett, and the particularly "English" slant long incorporated within the vernacular by our own John Taylor. The excitement Gwilym generates comes off best on fast, Fusion-type materials in which one is commanded to peer over the parapet to witness that two hands are genuinely capable of distinguishing improvised lines amid a forest of two-handed multiple-tempoed riffs. How much of what he says is actually "new" takes second consideration to the fact that he does this kind of stuff as well as, if not better than, anybody else one can think of. It is all very serious, very "literal", and very smoothly executed. There is a sense that he is comfortable within his range; and that range being one which surreptitiously slips in a polymodal chord combination or two from, for example, Messiaen's "Vingt Regards", as well as many more which John Taylor has already unselfconsciously adapted from English "pastoral" composers such as John Ireland and Jack Moeran, one is (unfairly?) left with an impression that the range in its self-sufficiency is all we need to look for, and never beyond. Bereft thus far of any detectable change of direction, one searches fruitlessly for clues of new possibilities.

    This concert wass one of three which are being presented at St James's during the LJF. The first, on Monday, which I unfortunately missed, was The Golden Age of Steam - a grouping from the fertile Loop Collective containing another, arguably more imaginatively adventurous pianist, Kit Downes, who is also a gifted exponent of keyboard electronics. At the venue on Friday coming the group is the impressive Liam Noble/Julian Siegel Quartet some may have heard on Sunday's JLU.

    S-A
  • Old Grumpy
    Full Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 3661

    #2
    Certainly sounds good, S-A. I am a fan of the man's output in all guises.

    OG

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37876

      #3
      Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
      Certainly sounds good, S-A. I am a fan of the man's output in all guises.

      OG
      Well, OG, what I can say is that imv it certainly was "flash". I'm not so certain as to how "good" it was judgeable from a jazz pov; one looks for either humour or "edge" and sense of risk-taking, but I found myself listening as though to a concert of modernish classical pieces in which the improvisatory element could have been pre-written out; the rockish elements seemed strangely at odds, as if to say, "I can be earthy as well as sophisticated". There was, one recalls, a lot of argument on the old board, claims that Gwilym had been over-cossetted by the Powers That Be. That said, I have heard a lot of Simcock in other band contexts, and, at his best, he puts his all into it and can really impress.

      Comment

      • charles t
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 592

        #4
        Serialist: Thanks much for your review of G.S. (George Shearing, you say?)

        Anyways, BBC currently podcasting Gwilym's improvisations on Ludwig Von's Symphony No. 5.

        I personally appreciate his understated style - giving a clean interpretation to the material...not about Gwilym...but about the music, man!

        Comment

        • Serial_Apologist
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 37876

          #5
          Sheep shearing, Charles, not George - I would never "welsh" on him...

          Comment

          • Ian Thumwood
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 4254

            #6
            SA

            i had the chance to hear both John Taylor and Simcock a couple of weeks ago and couldn't be bothered to go as I had heard them so often. Twenty years ago, I would have been really into this kind of jazz but am less enthusiastic now although Simcock's previous appearance in southampton with Mike Walker was one of the best gigs of last year.

            Not too familiar with the names you have mentioned but I think that the real developments in jazz piano are definately happening elsewhere. Off to see Bollani tomorrow night and he is another with Chick Corea associations - their recent duet album has been highly praised. Tend to switch off whenever European jazz pianists are mentioned these days whereas I loved this type of jazz in the 1990's. The further jazz piano becomes divorced from it's original "Black" identity, the less appreciative I become. i think someone like Kenny Garrett made some comment about the african quality within the playing of McCoy Tyner (there is also some lush romantism in there too, I feel) but I now feel increasingly paassionate that this is the essence of what jazz piano should be about. difficult not to see Simock's more "Classical" direction as something of a betrayal as to what jazz is about - wish he would stick to what he is good at. Not so enthusiastic these days but glad to see that your review is more balanced that the kind of cloth-eared reaction previously inflicted on the old board by probably the most narrow-minded jazz fan I've ever encountered.

            All in all, I feel that Simcock does get singled out. Another pianist who has picked up Classical influences has been Hiromi who played an improvisation of Beethoven's Pathetiqiue sonata when I saw her at Vienne this year. She was on a dobule bill with the elderly Ahmed Jamal who absolutely slaughtered her in a lesson as to what jazz piano is actually about. Hiroma, a kind of annoying jazz pokemon, is hugely talented from a technical persepctive and maybe even more impressive than Simcock in this regard. However, she is like a soul-less machine when she plays and whilst the experience is admittedly fascinating to watch, the music does not connect with the heart. She too has been singled out for praise by Chick Corea.

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37876

              #7
              Ian - one of the tunes Simcock improvised on yesterday was from Beethoven's Fifth!!! Not that I would have known: for reasons stated it was not possible to hear his announcements up in the gallery.

              Simcock and JT were broadcast a few years ago. I have a tape of them somewhere and will give it another listen; one thing I did note at the time was that JT was by far the sparkier of the two - as I would have expected - though I felt he was "diplomatically" holding himself back to some extent. Jazz musicians are lovely people, and this was an instance which I've seen elsewhere, but one which was detrimental to the quality of the music as a result!

              Comment

              • Ian Thumwood
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 4254

                #8
                SA

                I went to hear a solo piano recital last night given by the Italian jazz musician Stefano Bollani. He is a name that I had read about before but never actualy heard until a Jazz Library programme about 2 years ago (it was one whilst I was wrapping up Christmas presents.) It was quite evident that Alyn was a fan and the programme was defiantely far better than I had imagined. He is very far from being a typical ECM artist.

                The opening piece was a meditative version of a Stevie Wonder tune which I didn't know but this was followed up by a wonderful re-working of "I'm through with love." He also played Komeda's theme written for the film "Rosemary's baby" and a cinematic quality then seemed to grip proceedings. Further music associated with films cropped up later but a version of "Jitterbug Waltz" definatly broke the ice with the repeated use of missing beats, phrases played in odd juxtapositions with the time and his fingers flying off the keyboard to the amsuement of the audience as a line disappeared over the edge of the high register of the piano. He continued by playing inside the piano by using the strings as a percussion instrument but as opposed to be "daring", this was all showmanship and conjuted up in my mind the kind of audio background for a Charlie Chaplin film or a Tom & Jerry cartoon. Later on , "Sweet Georgia Brown" was similarly sent up.

                Discussing the performance with friends afterwards, we were all staggered that there were so many Italians in Southampton! Apparently Bollani is something of a TV star in Italy where he is the presenter of a rogramme that is very similar to Jools Holland's. There was certainly a very, very popularist edge to his work. His first encore consisted of a Medley of tunes suggested by the audience which included Round Midnight, Ravel's Bolero, a couple of standards, Scott Joplin, Queen's "We are the Champions" and even Silvio Berlusconi - much to the amusement of the audiencee. The genial Bollani was only too willing to oblige and a great time was had by all.

                However, here is the catch! Amongst the three of us discussing the music, not one thought what he played had much to do with jazz.
                He is a musical magpie with a terrific technique and an outstanding ability to improvise. Behind his musical adventures is a very creative mind and someone with a wonderful sense of humour. Absolutely the total opposite of the kind of cerebral and introspective music ECM specialise in. All sorts of styles were alluded to including Bill Evans, Fats Waller and perhaps the biggest influence of all, Erroll Garner. In fact, I really didn't feel that Bollani ever challenged more adventurous styles of jazz even if some of the music sounded like a Jarrett-inspired pastiche and there were odd moments where he crushed the notes with his elbow and made the piano growl in the manner of Don Pullen. Critically, it was difficult to see where Bollani himself was amongst all this.

                Whilst Bollani's levity would never permit an amiable "pat on the back" style of encounter as was the case with your experience between Taylor and Simcock, I came away thinking he was a brilliant pianist but very much a Classical musician who has absorbed many of the styles of jazz (certainly up to about 1960) but without really understanding the point of it. All in all, it was an entertaining evening despite the introspective numbers having me lose concentration. I think this kind of music is interesting but the failure to spin out and develop an improvised line (exemplified by Steve Coleman last week) and a lack of focus in his ideas which seldom saw his playing ever getting "in the zone" marks him down in my estimation. Last year there was a bit of controversy about Phineas Newborn not being considered a "genuine, worthy" jazz musician by the likes of BLuesnik. If anything, (and I liked Newborn's music!), Bollani would be a better example. Never-the-less, if you go to one of his gigs, you WILL be entertained.

                Comment

                Working...
                X