In what way was the principal choir class of the Leipzig Thomasschule, consisting of the best 12 to 16 singers, which Bach directed himself in alternate weeks at the Thomaskirche and the Nicolaikirche, from 1723 until shortly before he temporarily left in 1789 not "what we would now call a choir"? We also know from Bach's writing that (apart from his most ambitious works that required larger vocal forces) he thought "three or four voices to a part were ideal". (Bach Dokumente, i; Schriftstücke von der Hand Johann Sebastian Bachs, ed. Neumann and Schulze, 1963, p. 60)
"Potentially uplifting melodies, meditative grooves and soothing sounds..."
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Alyn_Shipton View PostIn what way was the principal choir class of the Leipzig Thomasschule, consisting of the best 12 to 16 singers, which Bach directed himself in alternate weeks at the Thomaskirche and the Nicolaikirche, from 1723 until shortly before he temporarily left in 1789 not "what we would now call a choir"? We also know from Bach's writing that (apart from his most ambitious works that required larger vocal forces) he thought "three or four voices to a part were ideal". (Bach Dokumente, i; Schriftstücke von der Hand Johann Sebastian Bachs, ed. Neumann and Schulze, 1963, p. 60)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View Post1963, eh? I think you might find that musicological investigations regarding the voices available to and used by Bach have advanced somewhat since then.
Seems to me the argument turns on the tricky unquantifiable issue of prevailing sickness rates amongst 18th century German church singers. Were they of Kaufman-like fragility Rifkin and Parrott are probably right.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alyn_Shipton View Postthe principal choir class of the Leipzig Thomasschule, consisting of the best 12 to 16 singers
Comment
-
Comment