Originally posted by Ian Thumwood
View Post
Gradus
I don't think that the music is the problem with attracting an audience but I do wonder whether the "image" jazz clubs have is a barrier. When I went to Vienne a few years back Robert Glasper had just released "Black Radio" and it was interesting that this record was instantly recognised when a car drove past a group of students I was chatting to and they immediately recognised what it was. There was a lot of approval about this disc which made me appreciate that it wasn't so much the youngsters were not listening to jazz but simply listening to a kind of jazz older people were not checking out. I had a similar conversation with some twenty-somethings from France a few years later when they were raving about a performance the next night by a French saxophonist and a DJ. I think younger people will listen to jazz if it is available in an open air venue / busking on the street and especially at festivals. It will always appeal to those who are music students anyway. The problem with jazz clubs is the kind of "Fast Show" image which acts as a barrier to the casual music fan. It is not an especially inviting atmosphere whereas somewhere that would allow you to dance to jazz would have a much greater appeal. This is clearly the case with the newer musicians emerging from the UK who have absolutely nailed this and reconnected jazz with it's social function which jazz clubs had actually alienated. I would add that I would want to listen to the music and not dance to it yet I would bet that most fans under the age of 30 will feel totally different to everyone posting on here.
The Concorde Club is about five miles away from where I live and this is the most famous jazz club in my area. I believe that it has been in existence for longer than Ronnie Scott's but the clientele is not the same as those attending gigs at the Turner Sims. It is ages since I have been there and these days there are more "tribute" acts booked to appear than genuine jazz acts. Back in the 70s and 80s it did attract some significant names albeit they had a policy of booking more conservative acts. In the past I have seen The Dirty Dozen, Scot Hamilton, Gene Harris, BBC Big Band, Howard Alden and Georgie Fame there. Most of the people who go here are retired and middle class. The cost prohibits younger people and I think the ambience of the club would be a challenge too. The biggest problem for me is that people chat throughout the gig. The fans tend to sit near the front whereas the people who have turned up for a meal site the other side of the stage.
By contrast, the Turner Sims is on the Southampton university complex and, as a consequence, has the potential to attract a younger audience. There are still older people attending but I once had a conversation with the manager who explained that he could never gauge which gigs would be popular. The example he made was of a piano trio from Luxembourg whose gig sold out whereas the following concert by Mike Gibb's big band was half empty. I just think that the audience for jazz is unpredictable and fickle. It might even be that there are , in fact, several audiences. However, I do feel that the idea of a traditional jazz club is off-putting for someone who is not an avid fan. In attention, the charges of drinks does make it an expensive evening. Of all the gigs I have been to, I would suggest that less than 10% have been in jazz clubs. There are not too many around and locally there are better options at concert venues. There is not real competition with the Concorde club losing it's reputation as a "serious" jazz venue and being more of a tourist venue complete with hotel. I concur with the sentiments of the benefits of a dedicated jazz club yet I don't think it is necessarily better than saw The Beresford, Stamshaw near Southsea where I have heard Will Bernard before.
I don't think that the music is the problem with attracting an audience but I do wonder whether the "image" jazz clubs have is a barrier. When I went to Vienne a few years back Robert Glasper had just released "Black Radio" and it was interesting that this record was instantly recognised when a car drove past a group of students I was chatting to and they immediately recognised what it was. There was a lot of approval about this disc which made me appreciate that it wasn't so much the youngsters were not listening to jazz but simply listening to a kind of jazz older people were not checking out. I had a similar conversation with some twenty-somethings from France a few years later when they were raving about a performance the next night by a French saxophonist and a DJ. I think younger people will listen to jazz if it is available in an open air venue / busking on the street and especially at festivals. It will always appeal to those who are music students anyway. The problem with jazz clubs is the kind of "Fast Show" image which acts as a barrier to the casual music fan. It is not an especially inviting atmosphere whereas somewhere that would allow you to dance to jazz would have a much greater appeal. This is clearly the case with the newer musicians emerging from the UK who have absolutely nailed this and reconnected jazz with it's social function which jazz clubs had actually alienated. I would add that I would want to listen to the music and not dance to it yet I would bet that most fans under the age of 30 will feel totally different to everyone posting on here.
The Concorde Club is about five miles away from where I live and this is the most famous jazz club in my area. I believe that it has been in existence for longer than Ronnie Scott's but the clientele is not the same as those attending gigs at the Turner Sims. It is ages since I have been there and these days there are more "tribute" acts booked to appear than genuine jazz acts. Back in the 70s and 80s it did attract some significant names albeit they had a policy of booking more conservative acts. In the past I have seen The Dirty Dozen, Scot Hamilton, Gene Harris, BBC Big Band, Howard Alden and Georgie Fame there. Most of the people who go here are retired and middle class. The cost prohibits younger people and I think the ambience of the club would be a challenge too. The biggest problem for me is that people chat throughout the gig. The fans tend to sit near the front whereas the people who have turned up for a meal site the other side of the stage.
By contrast, the Turner Sims is on the Southampton university complex and, as a consequence, has the potential to attract a younger audience. There are still older people attending but I once had a conversation with the manager who explained that he could never gauge which gigs would be popular. The example he made was of a piano trio from Luxembourg whose gig sold out whereas the following concert by Mike Gibb's big band was half empty. I just think that the audience for jazz is unpredictable and fickle. It might even be that there are , in fact, several audiences. However, I do feel that the idea of a traditional jazz club is off-putting for someone who is not an avid fan. In attention, the charges of drinks does make it an expensive evening. Of all the gigs I have been to, I would suggest that less than 10% have been in jazz clubs. There are not too many around and locally there are better options at concert venues. There is not real competition with the Concorde club losing it's reputation as a "serious" jazz venue and being more of a tourist venue complete with hotel. I concur with the sentiments of the benefits of a dedicated jazz club yet I don't think it is necessarily better than saw The Beresford, Stamshaw near Southsea where I have heard Will Bernard before.
Comment