Originally posted by Ian Thumwood
View Post
The place for jazz videos
Collapse
X
-
Joseph
I was around at the time Davis came out of retirement around 1980 and can remember reading reviews in newspapers like The Guardian at college which gave the comeback albums almost hagiographical reviews. The one I remember most was for "Star People." From recollection, the autobiograhy mentioned something along the line of Davis being completely out of touch with the jazz that was emerging in the 1980s other than his contempt for Wynton Marsalis. Personally, I think that the 1980s will go down as one of the most creative periods on jazz , no so much because there was a clear figurehead to direct where the music might be heading but because the music seemed to split up in to so many possibilities. At the same time, there were still musicians from the 20s and 30s who were still performing whereas a lot of Hard Bop musicians were still effectively middle-aged. There was so much creativity and originality and a good proportion seemed to come out of the underground scenes of the 1970s when Jazz-rock had ensured that acoustic forms could not get much of a look in. There is a really good chapter in Jimmy Heath's book about how the influence of rock caused record producers to meddle with the output of musicians who were not really interested in this route. On top of this, labels like ECM were taking an original approach to jazz which often reflected European ideals. It is quite fascinating to rattle off names of musicians who emegred from that decade and see just how wide-ranging their music was and how innovative. You can go from the likes of David Murray, Henry Threadgill, goerge Gruntz, John Surman, John Taylor, Keith Jarrett, Bill Frisell,AEoC, Arthur Blythe, Cecil Taylor, Billy Bang, Paul Bley, John Scofield, Abdullah Ibrahim, etc, etc and pretty much all of this music is superior to anything put out by Davis from 1980 until his passing. Even if you take a more fusion - orientated route, you can find people like Pat Metheny creating better jazz than Miles was doing in his last decade. When you go back to the 1970s and pick up the antecedents of a lot of this music, it does strike me that jazz was more "happening" in say the Loft Scene than what was occuring in Davis' groups. Once the likes of Shorter, Hancock, Holland, Corea , DeJohnette, etc had left, the musicians he was left with were either not of the same calibre of were of the likes of Dave Liebman, John Scofield, Branford Marsalis or Kenny Garrett who made better music with their own bands.
I think the unfortunate thing for Miles was that his resurgance became more of a struggle to remain relevant. I don't think that much of his post- early 70's stuff really amounts to much. I appreciate your opinion is different but you might want to check out the work of someone like Paul Motian before dismissing it. Motian offered many possibilities , all of which were relevant and respectful of what jazz had been and where it could go. The trio with Frisell and Lovano was exceptional. They could play standards absolutely straight and grab your attention whilst simultaneously playing completely outside. The body of work they produced ranged from Broadway material through Monk and on to Bill Evans as well as a hugely impressive library of originals. Dispensing with a bass instrument, all three musicians had to work for each other to maintain the momentum.
I can appreciate some of Miles' early 70's work but would argue that his last "great" studio albums were "Filles de Kilamanjaro" and "Bitches Brew" plus a number of good live albums. After this point, I feel you need to be selective and, as you get into the 1980s, maybe only "Aura" is worth the money albeit "The man with the horn" features some of Davis' better post-retirement improvisation. Other than that, there is not a great deal going on. It is all veneer. I grant you that mine is a personal opinion but I would suggest that most of the people on this board are likely to share my point of view. I don't fel that the music he produced in the 70s and 80's stacks up as his best work by a long chalk. There is nowhere as much "happening" in the music as was the case in the 50s annd 60's when his bands were effectively the Rolls Royce's of jazz.
There is an interesting article on one of the wbesites this week about Keith Jarrett's debut solo album "Facing You" which is now 50 years old. Quite shocking to learn how old it is and also to appreciate that it was made during a hiatus during a tour if Europe of Miles' band. It almost seems like a different kind of music let alone something made by a member of Davis' then-current group.
Comment
-
-
Charles Mingus with Charles McPherson, Bobby Jones, Jon Faddis, John Foster & Roy Brooks playing 'Blues With The Saw' in Europe(?), 1972(?).
This was the same sextet as on the recent 3-CD set 'The Lost Album From Ronnie Scott's':
Blues with the Saw - Charles Mingus 1971 Bassist Chales Mingus (1922-1979) is highly ranked among the composers and performers of jazz, and he recorded many ...
JR
Comment
-
-
I thought that the clip Joseph posted of Keith Jarrett was fascinating. The music is pretty incredible yet I find it extremely difficult to watch this pianist perform. I saw him with the same trio about 30 years ago and was a little under-whelmed at the time. Jarrett is one of those musicians you would consider to be a bit "marmite" but I am more of the persuasion that this trio is nothing short of incredible when they are in the zone. Thanks for posting.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ian Thumwood View PostI thought that the clip Joseph posted of Keith Jarrett was fascinating. The music is pretty incredible yet I find it extremely difficult to watch this pianist perform. I saw him with the same trio about 30 years ago and was a little under-whelmed at the time. Jarrett is one of those musicians you would consider to be a bit "marmite" but I am more of the persuasion that this trio is nothing short of incredible when they are in the zone. Thanks for posting.
Comment
-
Comment