If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I remember seeing Chuck Berry on his very first UK tour in 1964 in Bristol, a package tour including the Animals and Carl Perkins of "Blue Seude Shoes" fame, and hence a large contingent of front row aging Teds. Chuck, aware of changing times, rejigged the chorus of his "School Days" from "Hail Hail Rock and Roll" to "Hail Hail Rhythm and Blues". Very loud and visible protests from Les Teds at this traitorous affront.
People display musical allegiance as identity and to gain social capital. Read Pierre Bourdieu's "Distinction", a classic dissection of petite bourgeoisie aspirational role playing. And learn from Chuck's experience...
The thing is that when people are splitting hairs over genres like rock and rock&roll, or R&B and R'n'B, they'll happily stick the label of "classical music" on what they think is "classical music". So that's classical music dealt with (NB not talking about the highly informed forumistas here).
Interesting ff, that precisely because of the hair splitting and inconclusive genres I have only two classifications - Classical and Non-classical. Even then there crossover repertoire but so what?
Interesting ff, that precisely because of the hair splitting and inconclusive genres I have only two classifications - Classical and Non-classical. Even then there crossover repertoire but so what?
I have only three absolute classifications...
GOOD...what I call good
EQUALLY GOOD...other people agreeing with me.
BAD....what people other than the above call good.
"Hell is other people's... purile musical tastes and their bloody awful record collections" - Jean-Paul Sartre. (Vinyl and Nothingness).
Interesting ff, that precisely because of the hair splitting and inconclusive genres I have only two classifications - Classical and Non-classical. Even then there crossover repertoire but so what?
And I suspect many jazz listeners have two genres - jazz and not jazz. And then even jazz has its different kinds. The more you know about a subject, the more fundamental differences you recognise, which is why 'classical music' is all lumped together by most people: no opera, or chamber music, or symphonic or Renaissance polyphony and contemporary electro-acoustic.
Like you, I have classical (of widely/wildly varying kinds), crossover and non classical.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Could the general populace simplify that Map to ROCK ( +folk)?
Like with "urban" music it seems every almost ensemble invents themselves a micro genre.
I remember when a certain type of Rock fan split the Popular music world into Rock - the good stuff and Pop - the rest. That seemed to ease during the punk era and beyond
Comment