Originally posted by CGR
View Post
The problem is more one of repertoire and format. There are too many albums that rely of the Broadway song book or feature a backing trio of piano / bass / drums. Sometimes I look at the reviews and you realise that is a very large base of female singing who work within this field and, even if some might have a degree of "cabaret" about them, I bet the majority are the product of the stringent jazz education. The issue is more to do with the perception that this is a tradition that is someway fixed like Gypsy Jazz as opposed to something that, in the most successful examples, reflects the music of the time. This , for me, is a stumbling block with Cecile McLoren Salvant setting aside the fact that her performances are too mannered. Never been a fan of Christine Tobin but the track recently played by her group this week was very good and neatly sums up what I feel differentiates between what is credible jazz and what is almost cosmetics.
What I do find interesting is that non-jazz vocalists working in a jazz context don't often get the same degree of criticism. I think that recent efforts by the likes of Annie Lennox deserve the opprobrium levelled against their efforts which cover hackneyed material performed elsewhere no to mention to notorious effort by Tiri Tikanawa in the early 1990s. However, critics seem less hostile with efforts such as folk singer Aoife O'Donovan's contribution of Dave Douglas' album of hymns called "Be still" or say the even more successful collaboration between Robert Fonseca and Fatamatou Diawara who comes from a African tradition totally alien to jazz yet produced a true meeting of minds.
Comment