What Jazz are you listening to now?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tenor Freak View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BLUESNIK'S REVOX View PostThat's the album with the tune "Maybe Next Year" that Art Pepper featured on his "Smack Up" 1960 date? It's a fine ballad.
Provided to YouTube by Xelon EntertainmentMaybe Next Year · Duane TatroJazz for Moderns℗ 2020 AmanitaReleased on: 2020-11-27Auto-generated by YouTube.
Will have to dig out my copy of 'Smack Up' to hear that Art Pepper version again.
JR
Comment
-
-
I dug out my discs by the French group "The Bongo Hop" which features the legendary Columbian singer Nidia Gongora. I saw this band at Vienne several years back. I think they are effectively a pop act that is influenced by jazz as opposed to being "full on" jazz. No problem with this. The music they produce is hugely effective and great fun to list to. I love Gongora's singing....
Comment
-
-
Nidia Gongora is perhaps more celebrated for her with British producer / musician William Holland, otherwise known as Quantic. Again, it is stange than no one has ever touted Quantic on this board. This music is hugely infective!
I love this track which translates as slang for money.The video is also terrific with all the kids smiling. Impossible not to like this record.
Comment
-
-
I liked the Jessica William's track.
I was working from home yesterday and went through loads of old LPs whilst I was drafting out an Activity Schedule. It has been quite interesting to listen to some of these records after many years and tended to play through a lot of big band jazz from 1930s including Bunny Berigan. Also played some "Loose Tubes", Chick Corea, Lionel Hampton with Ben Webster / Clark Terry, Coleman Hawkins as well as Keith Jarrett's recording of the Well Tempered Klavier Book 1.
It was quite informative to play the debut recording of Keith Jarrett's Standards trio after Oscar Peterson's "We get requests." I think that the trio's debut was quite inauspicious with a tedious version of "God bless the child" played against a back beat and lots of Gary Peacock's bass. I have never played Peterson back-to-back with Jarrett and I was quite surprised how well the older musician contrasted with Jarrett, especially from a technical point of view. They are the technical equal of each other and both seem heavily indebted to Classical music - Peterson actually quoting Bach at one point. It is ages since I listened to Peterson (my Dad bought me this LP when I was about 17 and was interested in learning jazz piano) and I still find him difficult to appreciate. This 1962 recording does show the influence of Bill Evans and it is not the cold, technical experience I had anticipated. Still, the expansive playing of Jarrett is markedly different to Oscar Peterson's really conservative approach. I liked Peterson's playing more than I recollected yet he seems more "connected" to a populist approach to jazz as opposed to being really hard -hitting. It does make you wonder whether this fate is what awaits Brad Mehldau's reputation ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ian Thumwood View PostI liked the Jessica William's track.
I was working from home yesterday and went through loads of old LPs whilst I was drafting out an Activity Schedule. It has been quite interesting to listen to some of these records after many years and tended to play through a lot of big band jazz from 1930s including Bunny Berigan. Also played some "Loose Tubes", Chick Corea, Lionel Hampton with Ben Webster / Clark Terry, Coleman Hawkins as well as Keith Jarrett's recording of the Well Tempered Klavier Book 1.
It was quite informative to play the debut recording of Keith Jarrett's Standards trio after Oscar Peterson's "We get requests." I think that the trio's debut was quite inauspicious with a tedious version of "God bless the child" played against a back beat and lots of Gary Peacock's bass. I have never played Peterson back-to-back with Jarrett and I was quite surprised how well the older musician contrasted with Jarrett, especially from a technical point of view. They are the technical equal of each other and both seem heavily indebted to Classical music - Peterson actually quoting Bach at one point. It is ages since I listened to Peterson (my Dad bought me this LP when I was about 17 and was interested in learning jazz piano) and I still find him difficult to appreciate. This 1962 recording does show the influence of Bill Evans and it is not the cold, technical experience I had anticipated. Still, the expansive playing of Jarrett is markedly different to Oscar Peterson's really conservative approach. I liked Peterson's playing more than I recollected yet he seems more "connected" to a populist approach to jazz as opposed to being really hard -hitting. It does make you wonder whether this fate is what awaits Brad Mehldau's reputation ?
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
SA
i find Oscar Peterson a bit problematic, to be honest. As a accompanist to other musicians, I always feel that his comping is the aural equivalent of a feather bed and perhaps offered support that soloists would have found hugely beneficial. However, I feel that it can sometimes seem a bit over the top. In these more lazy times, the support he provided might be replaced with synthesizers where something equally lush but much less musical could be offered as an alternative. From a musical perspective, I think OP was perfection in this respect although his approach is not really to my taste. I think someone like Wynton Kelly was much more effective in this respect.
I would have to say that I much prefer OP without support. He is far more interesting as an unaccompanied soloist. My favourite album of his is the duet with Milt Jackson where you feel OP is really working to produce the result. I find him more satisfying when he seems to be challenged.
His later work seemed to absorb Bill Evans in addition to the earlier soloists you mentioned. I would love to know what OP felt about other pianists and who he rated as well as those he didn't. From recollection, he was not a fan of Thelonious Monk and believe that the ill-feelings were mutual.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ian Thumwood View PostSA
i find Oscar Peterson a bit problematic, to be honest. As a accompanist to other musicians, I always feel that his comping is the aural equivalent of a feather bed and perhaps offered support that soloists would have found hugely beneficial. However, I feel that it can sometimes seem a bit over the top. In these more lazy times, the support he provided might be replaced with synthesizers where something equally lush but much less musical could be offered as an alternative. From a musical perspective, I think OP was perfection in this respect although his approach is not really to my taste. I think someone like Wynton Kelly was much more effective in this respect.
I would have to say that I much prefer OP without support. He is far more interesting as an unaccompanied soloist. My favourite album of his is the duet with Milt Jackson where you feel OP is really working to produce the result. I find him more satisfying when he seems to be challenged.
His later work seemed to absorb Bill Evans in addition to the earlier soloists you mentioned. I would love to know what OP felt about other pianists and who he rated as well as those he didn't. From recollection, he was not a fan of Thelonious Monk and believe that the ill-feelings were mutual.
I prefer Oscar P unaccompanied as well. Julian Joseph once cited an album of solo standards which had influenced him - as finger exercises, I think!
Comment
-
Comment