What Jazz are you listening to now?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ian Thumwood
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 4129

    Bluesnik's comment about Shepp's lack of chops is something that makes it difficult for me to listen to him. I have a later CD recorded in the 1990s with a German pianist but it is pretty mainstream and not particularly good. The Impulse records have never appealed enough for me to explore so I am unable to comment. Even if you laud the 1960's output, I there is a lot of time where he was passed by as a consequence of other developments in jazz. Technically, both fusion and the return to more bop orientated material is superior to what Shepp was doing and by the time you get to musicians like Mike Brecker, Branford Marsalis or David Murrary, surely Shepp's time had passed ?

    The problem with a lot of the freer players of that generation is that they did not really have the depth of harmonic understanding than has been central to jazz since players like Herbie Hancock arrived on the scene. There are some Blue Note records where Herbie is totally "out" and because of the music theory behind it, you just listen perplexed. With someone like Shepp, you can pretty much grasp what is happening immediately. I saw him with Jason Moran recently and was surprised that the pianist found Shepp sufficiently interesting musically to perform with. I concur that Shepp wears his heart of his sleeve and is 100% genuine. I also accept the argument that the Impulse records are classics. From my perspective, I find his playing a bit boring and think that if you want that incendiary approach to free jazz, there are others who have followed in his wake and done it much better. Had he arrived on the scene more recently and not had the associations with Coltrane, I don't feel his stock would be so high. Of course, there is the counter argument that the current generation of saxophonists are identikit models churned out by the universities throughout the world - the kind of musicians who would probably have little time for a player like Shepp. You can appreciate why Shepp still has some stock with fans as he plays with the kind of passion that is decidedly unfashionable at the moment. However, to throw in another example of a player who is equally both incendiary and capable of tipping his hat to players from the 1930s, Shepp is nowhere near the calibre of a player like James Carter who can seemingly make his saxophone do the impossible. Personally, I feel fans cut Shepp more slack than is necessary.

    I would have to say that I think that the best free jazz is produced by people who have more technical command and musical understanding to "give up" in order to go in that direction. I was reading Jazzrook's excellent review of the new Dolphy box set on A##### whilst following this thread and feel that Dolphy probably exemplifies for me this difference with reed instruments. Dolphy is no less strident than Shepp to listen to but there is far more to grasp in his music than with Shepp. Shepp seems very much of his time (and, in his more recent incarnation, of before his time too!) whereas I think someone like Dolphy laid down more solid foundations.

    Comment

    • cloughie
      Full Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 22110

      A##### = D

      Comment

      • Serial_Apologist
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 37559

        Originally posted by cloughie View Post
        A##### = D
        That's not a flat statement of fact though, is it!

        Comment

        • Stanfordian
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 9308


          ‘Happenings’

          Bobby Hutcherson with Herbie Hancock, Bob Cranshaw & Joe Chambers
          Blue Note (1966)

          Comment

          • cloughie
            Full Member
            • Dec 2011
            • 22110

            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
            That's not a flat statement of fact though, is it!
            Very sharp!

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37559

              Originally posted by cloughie View Post
              Very sharp!
              Veritably sharp!!!

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37559

                Originally posted by Ian Thumwood View Post
                Bluesnik's comment about Shepp's lack of chops is something that makes it difficult for me to listen to him.
                I've been thinking about this question of technique, adequate or not. Many of the new generation of 1960s players - not just the free ones - developed techniques which were different from those of the beboppers, whose techniques were worked on to enable them to cover the extended range that had been required of the bebop harmonic language, which they felt restrictive and favouring a standardised sound. Bebop phraseology in a player such as Sonny Rollins, who had mastered it in the early 1950s to levels commensurate with those reached by Charle Parker on alto, became less prominent after the Williamsburg Bridge woodshedding phase, when timbre and spacing became Sonny's hallmark; meanwhile Coltrane, who had developed the bebop way into the "sheets of sound" approach, really consisting of piling in as many arpeggiated harmonic superimpositions as time allowed over standard and 12-bar changes, switched directions for the modal, scalar approach he would go on to complexify as his concept evolved. What then began as the relatively simple single or double scales on soprano in the original version of "My Favourite Things" waqs expanded in the spirit of complexity epitomising its time. Wayne Shorter has spoken of his playing becoming transformed after joining Miles. I can think of numerous players who started out as mastered beboppers, who then evolved away from that particualr vocabulary into different areas, so that on rare occasion when they returned to chords-based themes the means appropriate to freer areas of expression could no longer be made to fit into the earlier stylistic context - John Surman being one who comes to mind, David Murray another. I would argue that the context forms, and is (in)formed by, the technique that is appropriate to it. Or, as the cliché has it, you can't ever go back... really.

                http://www.archieball.com From The Hang: Archie Shepp, the veteran saxophonist, educator and activist discusses Albert Ayler and the impact of his music.
                Last edited by Serial_Apologist; 18-03-19, 15:37. Reason: Shepp interview link added for... pertinence?

                Comment

                • BLUESNIK'S REVOX
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 4270

                  Steve Grossman, one of the post Coltrane tenors (of that studying grouping), ex Miles etc, now plays very much like early 60s Sonny Rollins. I'd say a lot better for it. True, very differently from his Miles period, a reinvention or partial reversion to the "old". My point about Shepp's technique and limits is not a put down, as you say technique is in context and what is required to personally express. It's not a SATS test for saxophonists or any other musician/artist. I do not think Shepp is that great in a be bop context or "black classical music" as he calls it. Idiosyncratic yes, but that idiosyncrasy works far better in the genre he initially carved out. The sides with Bobby Hutcherson are a high spot to me. As is "Four for Trane", a GREAT record.

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37559

                    Originally posted by BLUESNIK'S REVOX View Post
                    Steve Grossman, one of the post Coltrane tenors (of that studying grouping), ex Miles etc, now plays very much like early 60s Sonny Rollins. I'd say a lot better for it. True, very differently from his Miles period, a reinvention or partial reversion to the "old". My point about Shepp's technique and limits is not a put down, as you say technique is in context and what is required to personally express. It's not a SATS test for saxophonists or any other musician/artist. I do not think Shepp is that great in a be bop context or "black classical music" as he calls it. Idiosyncratic yes, but that idiosyncrasy works far better in the genre he initially carved out. The sides with Bobby Hutcherson are a high spot to me. As is "Four for Trane", a GREAT record.
                    Agree with all the above.

                    Comment

                    • Jazzrook
                      Full Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 3061

                      I've always liked Shepp's 'The Original Mr. Sonny Boy Williamson' with Bobby Hutcherson from his hard-to-find Impulse! album 'On This Night':

                      Provided to YouTube by Universal Music GroupThe Original Mr. Sonny Boy Williamson · Archie SheppOn This Night℗ 1966 GRP Records Inc.Released on: 1966-01-01Pr...


                      JR

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37559

                        Originally posted by Jazzrook View Post
                        I've always liked Shepp's 'The Original Mr. Sonny Boy Williamson' with Bobby Hutcherson from his hard-to-find Impulse! album 'On This Night':

                        Provided to YouTube by Universal Music GroupThe Original Mr. Sonny Boy Williamson · Archie SheppOn This Night℗ 1966 GRP Records Inc.Released on: 1966-01-01Pr...


                        JR
                        A new one on me - thanks JR.

                        Comment

                        • BLUESNIK'S REVOX
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 4270

                          On the "technique" thing, I was listening to a long radio discussion on YouTube about Monk from the 1980s, with Nat Hentoff and Dick Katz. Katz recalling the early days and the first Bluenote records. He said he liked the compositions but it wasn't the piano virtuoso piano work like Bud Powell and he was initially unsure about that aspect from a "bop" standpoint. But he was studying with Teddy Wilson and it was Wilson ("a real surprise given he was the doyen of touch and sophistication") who enthused about Monk, got him immediately and early, and said "the rhythm, the rhythm he's got is incredible". Context.

                          Comment

                          • burning dog
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 1509

                            Monk was a pianist who understood stride piano you need an inner metronome to play it


                            Monk was was "modernist" deconstructing* the music of Fats Waller and James P Johnson whereas Powell was a "progressive" improving on Hines et al

                            Worth discussing ??

                            Its actually my Grandads (b. 1905) provocative/(tongue in cheek?) theory. He didn't like Bebop or "Modern" jazz, except for Monk who he thought was incorrectly called the High Priest of Bebop.

                            *He wouldn't have used that word but that's what he meant


                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiM_RJevQbQ This is wonderful IMO
                            Last edited by burning dog; 18-03-19, 19:02.

                            Comment

                            • Ian Thumwood
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 4129

                              Originally posted by BLUESNIK'S REVOX View Post
                              On the "technique" thing, I was listening to a long radio discussion on YouTube about Monk from the 1980s, with Nat Hentoff and Dick Katz. Katz recalling the early days and the first Bluenote records. He said he liked the compositions but it wasn't the piano virtuoso piano work like Bud Powell and he was initially unsure about that aspect from a "bop" standpoint. But he was studying with Teddy Wilson and it was Wilson ("a real surprise given he was the doyen of touch and sophistication") who enthused about Monk, got him immediately and early, and said "the rhythm, the rhythm he's got is incredible". Context.
                              I knew that someone would quote Monk at some point. It is strange why people ever questioned his technique. I was unaware than Wilson was an enthusiast but Ellington was equally impressed. The phrasing and sense of time in Monk's playing is sublime but he was just another link in the chain of pianists who thought like that which stretches from Duke right through to more modern players like Andrew Hill and Jason Moran. Anyone who has tried to tackle pieces like "Hornin' in" will quickly appreciate that Monk had technique. Some of his tunes are ridiculously difficult to play. I really don't buy into the arguments about Monk having limited technique and have read interviews with the likes of Kenny Barron who have been quick to dismiss this notion.

                              The "best" example of someone with limited technique for me is the New Orleans clarinettist George Lewis who was discovered in the late 40's and was another of those Traditional musicians championed by the Left including the likes of Eric Hobsbawm over here. I love New Orleans jazz and whilst I can appreciate some of the originals like Johnny Dodds and Jimmy Noone for their shear originality, the summit of the tradition was always Sidney Bechet as far as I have been concerned. A track like "Blue Horizon" is one of the greatest clarinet solos in the history of jazz. I just think he was the consummate musician, being good enough as far back as 1919 when he performed professionally with Will Marion Cook's orchestra. The clarinet playing of players from New Orleans such as Omer Simeon, Noone, Bechet, Bigard and Irving Fazola is distinguished by the beauty of their music. By contrast, Lewis always seemed like the amateur he was who was fortunate to have been "rediscovered" at a time when a proportion of the learned criticism of the time was looking for something that had a stronger folk element than the more academic direction jazz had increasingly taken by the 1930s onwards. I acknowledge that Lewis has his protagonists but I find his playing painful in the extreme to listen to. It may have been "authentic" but I struggle to hear any merits in his playing. The fact that is frequently goes out of tune and his playing is littered with wrong notes makes listening to his music an anxious experience. Because of his humble origins and his links to the very early, pre-Armstrong era of the music, many fans cut him a tremendous amount of slack. I wonder at the degree opprobrium that would have been released if Woody Allen had ever played that bad!

                              The reason I mention this is because of the obvious link between Left wing advocacy of those supporters of Lewis and Shepp. I think Shepp is unquestionably the more "musical" of the two but I just find it interesting to see how politics can be used to generate an audience for someone's music because it has less associations with academia and seen as being "authentic." I understand that , in Lewis' case, he was initially championed by Alan Lomax who did similar favours for the likes of Pete Seeger and Leadbelly. To my ears, there is a little bit of the same with Shepp whose prominence coincided with the Civil Rights movement. For some, rawness is seen as being "authentic" and I am not always convinced that this is the best parameter by which to judge some music.

                              I don't think that Shepp is quite on a par with Lewis but when I heard him play a few years back I was bewildered what a player like Jason Moran got from playing in his band whereas when I have heard him play with Shepp's contemporary Charles Lloyd, the level of creativity expected goes up several notches.

                              I think that there will be some who contribute here who won't necessarily agree with my opinions although there have been some interesting posts and comments on this thread concerning Shepp which are strongly suggestive than a lot of people feel differently about this matter.
                              Last edited by Ian Thumwood; 18-03-19, 19:30.

                              Comment

                              • burning dog
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 1509

                                it would be hard to fault the technique of this particular George Lewis


                                Provided to YouTube by The Orchard EnterprisesLush Life · George LewisThe Solo Trombone Record℗ 2008 SackvilleReleased on: 2001-09-09Auto-generated by YouTube.


                                Great tune (by Strayhorn of course)

                                On Shepp and the new thing in general. I think they DID have an enormous influence but some aspects of their music was very quickly adopted by some older "Modern" players, Coltrane and Sam Rivers for example (Sonny Rollins was more taken with Ornette I think). Players like David Murray, the generation just before Marsalis and Co. fully integrated their influence - without " copying" in either case.

                                Funnily enough Youtube has selected tracks the other George Lewis to follow my video of the Trombonist
                                Last edited by burning dog; 18-03-19, 19:38.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X