Margaret Thatcher dies

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flosshilde
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7988

    Originally posted by anotherbob View Post
    I see in The Telegraph that suggestions are being sought for a suitable memorial for MT. Surely there are countless already in existence e.g Shotton?

    'If you seek her memorial, look around you'

    Or there's always the ghastly statue that was decapitated - preferably in its decapitated state.

    Comment

    • An_Inspector_Calls

      Originally posted by french frank View Post
      But it comes back to the point that (regardless of whether Council Z's Housing was provided at a profit or loss) it was a public service.
      But there's no written law, holy writ that says that housing has to be entirely a public service. I see nothing wrong with the public sector providing a certain amount of housing at low rents (surely possible now that so many building materials allow houses to be nearly maintenance free) and some provided by the private sector - at a profit. Commissioning government services from the private sector is accepted in certain areas so why can't this model be applied to housing - and the health service for that matter?

      Comment

      • eighthobstruction
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 6432

        Originally posted by An_Inspector_Calls View Post
        But there's no written law, holy writ that says that housing has to be entirely a public service. I see nothing wrong with the public sector providing a certain amount of housing at low rents (surely possible now that so many building materials allow houses to be nearly maintenance free) and some provided by the private sector - at a profit. Commissioning government services from the private sector is accepted in certain areas so why can't this model be applied to housing - and the health service for that matter?
        I award THIS above post the most totally humourous of the whole thread.....in fact of any thread REF Politics ever attempted on this board....What is this genre called Pathos , Bathos???....or is it a sort of Optimism spelled D-E-N-I-A-L....
        bong ching

        Comment

        • An_Inspector_Calls

          Originally posted by Julien Sorel View Post
          Yes. They wanted the public to keep on buying coal from pits that were uneconomical. The proposal was to improve the viability of the mines by mechanisation, lay-off a proportion of the workforce, and close the least viable pits. The NUM wanted no pit closures.

          Whether or not we'd gone through the 1984 debacle, its difficult to see how at present any coal-mining in the UK can be viable with coal so cheap on world markets. So they were going to close anyway.

          Comment

          • eighthobstruction
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 6432

            Originally posted by An_Inspector_Calls View Post
            Yes. They wanted the public to keep on buying coal from pits that were uneconomical. The proposal was to improve the viability of the mines by mechanisation, lay-off a proportion of the workforce, and close the least viable pits. The NUM wanted no pit closures.

            Whether or not we'd gone through the 1984 debacle, its difficult to see how at present any coal-mining in the UK can be viable with coal so cheap on world markets. So they were going to close anyway.
            Yes there is truth in what you say there, but i do not believe that is all of the story, just SOME of the story....
            bong ching

            Comment

            • Flosshilde
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7988

              Originally posted by MrGongGong
              Oh yes




              The weasel seems to be staring at the rabbit rather intently. The latter might get across the road safely, but I wouldn't give much for his chances once he's on the other side.

              Comment

              • rank_and_file

                With mounting distaste I have read most of the posts on this thread which seems to bring out the most disgraceful and vile wishes from most of the left-wing contributors. Without doubt most of the posters would be quite at home with the historical so-called nursing ethic at Stafford Hospital

                To think that the music of Bach or Schubert might bring you to tears, yet you post in this completely heartless, bitter, ill-informed and uncharitable manner about a woman so recently deceased after a long and unpleasant illness. Talk about hypocrites - you should be disgusted with your completely un-Christian thoughts and wishes: I wonder how you can live with yourselves?

                I am leaving this forum never to return, and resigning from FoR3 which seems to have lost its raison d’etre. I would hope, ff, that any human being deserves a little bit of charity, even if it is only “RIP.”

                Comment

                • Flosshilde
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 7988

                  A rather hysterical response. What's "disgraceful & vile" about expressing disagreement - even dislike - for her policies & practices?

                  Comment

                  • Julien Sorel

                    Originally posted by rank_and_file View Post
                    With mounting distaste I have read most of the posts on this thread which seems to bring out the most disgraceful and vile wishes from most of the left-wing contributors. Without doubt most of the posters would be quite at home with the historical so-called nursing ethic at Stafford Hospital

                    To think that the music of Bach or Schubert might bring you to tears, yet you post in this completely heartless, bitter, ill-informed and uncharitable manner about a woman so recently deceased after a long and unpleasant illness. Talk about hypocrites - you should be disgusted with your completely un-Christian thoughts and wishes: I wonder how you can live with yourselves?

                    I am leaving this forum never to return, and resigning from FoR3 which seems to have lost its raison d’etre. I would hope, ff, that any human being deserves a little bit of charity, even if it is only “RIP.”
                    Pinochet http://www.newyorker.com/online/blog...r-exhumed.html
                    Suharto http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ndonesia.world


                    Pol Pot http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-tha...ol-pot/5330873

                    And you talk about hypocrisy?

                    Comment

                    • eighthobstruction
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 6432

                      One does notice (seemingly) that there is a direct correlation between the difference in posts coming from (in general) approx above the River Trent and those below River Trent ....
                      bong ching

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30249

                        Well, I could close the thread and have resignations or leave it open and have resignations.

                        But this appears to be our second resignation from FoR3 (not the forum), and FoR3 is more important to me than the forum which is frankly getting to be more trouble than it's worth.

                        The alternative is to close Platform 3 and become just a Radio 3/music/arts forum.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X