If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thank you Frenchie for removing the highly provocative "R.I.P".
And the 'Baroness' , I hope you note . I'm not in favour of titles, me.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Well, former PM Sir Winston Churchill had a very special funeral, one my early memories. I'm sure others did. It's someone else's decision Mary, not yours :o
Well, he did do something (eventually) worth celebrating, which is rather more than Thatcher did. The policies & 'achievements' people are celebrating have been umitigated disasters. I'm pretty sure no other PM has had a 'special' funeral, & I don't think that any other PM has been ousted by their party while in office.
I think you probably have worked that one out for yourself ?
I'm sure you can find a load of weeping sheep on the Daily Mail website if thats what you seek ................
So what music would YOU be playing this evening then Peester ?
how about Elgar's ...... The Windlass ?
Selling off state industries was not good, but we can be thankful for being liberated from the robber-barons that were strangling the country.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Robber Barons ?
So selling off what was ours and now is owned by unknown private equity firms was a good thing ?
I think not
You don't understand. I know it was quite vague when I said SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. What I meant was, SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. Clear now?
The Robber Barons I was referring to were the Trades Unions. Stick to what you know
You miss understand. I know it was quite vague when I said SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. What I meant was, SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. Clear now?
The Robber Barons I was referring to were the Trades Unions. Stick to what you know
I no miss
You fall into the trap of the politicians of thinking that there are only two ways to do everything .............
The basic Tory strategy is that EVERYTHING is better off run by "Barons"
which is simply wrong
but the alternative doesn't have to be a Collective Farm .......... there are many ways of doing things
politicians like to think there are only two
and they are wrong about that
So is it Kipper policy to renationalise the power industry ?
or water ?
or the other things that ARE collective ?
So selling off what was ours and now is owned by unknown private equity firms was a good thing ?
And even though Macmillan said that 'as a Conservative' he was in favour of returning nationalised industries to the private sector, "What I ventured to question was the using of these huge sums as if they were income."
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
You fall into the trap of the politicians of thinking that there are only two ways to do everything .............
The basic Tory strategy is that EVERYTHING is better off run by "Barons"
which is simply wrong
but the alternative doesn't have to be a Collective Farm .......... there are many ways of doing things
politicians like to think there are only two
and they are wrong about that
So is it Kipper policy to renationalise the power industry ?
or water ?
or the other things that ARE collective ?
Well, former PM Sir Winston Churchill had a very special funeral, one my early memories. I'm sure others did. It's someone else's decision Mary, not yours
Well, he did do something (eventually) worth celebrating, which is rather more than Thatcher did. The policies & 'achievements' people are celebrating have been umitigated disasters. I'm pretty sure no other PM has had a 'special' funeral, & I don't think that any other PM has been ousted by their party while in office.
Sorting out Scargill and the Falklands were hardly disasters. The miners suffered but Scargill was just as bad an enemy to them by not negotiating in a professional manner.
- and look at past PM's wikis and you read about special funerals Churchill and several others
The miners suffered but Scargill was just as bad an enemy to them by not negotiating in a professional manner.
Ah, yes, the miners. Macmillan again:
"It breaks my heart to see—and I cannot interfere—what is happening in our country today. This terrible strike, by the best men in the world, who beat the Kaiser's and Hitler's armies and never gave in. It is pointless and we cannot afford that kind of thing. Then there is the growing division of Conservative prosperity in the south and the ailing north and Midlands. We used to have battles and rows but they were quarrels. Now there is a new kind of wicked hatred that has been brought in by different types of people."
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Hubris personified. The ugly legacy she left in the North of England still smarts and scars today.
Certainly NOT a state funeral. We did not know as much about other PMs. About Thatcher, we know a heck of a lot. I would be utterly opposed to a state funeral.
And if the exclusion zone had recently been increased in size? It really does seem to be very convenient for Thatcher's government.
Thatcher herself did not use your argument in her wrangle (ff's word ) with Diana Gould. She used the 'Belgrano was a danger to our ships even when moving away' argument, which is pretty hard to swallow.
Well as I said, an exclusion zone defines certainty of attack, but in war one can attack retreaters wherever they may be. WWI and WWII guns were used in 'offensive action' or bombardments to blast the enemy and destroy their artillery when they were retreating or cowering in their trenches, and on the seas many 'retreating' battleships were chased by submarines until they were destroyed.
Comment