Margaret Thatcher dies

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30253

    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
    Thank you Frenchie for removing the highly provocative "R.I.P".
    And the 'Baroness' , I hope you note . I'm not in favour of titles, me.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • Flosshilde
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 7988

      Originally posted by John Wright View Post
      Well, former PM Sir Winston Churchill had a very special funeral, one my early memories. I'm sure others did. It's someone else's decision Mary, not yours :o
      Well, he did do something (eventually) worth celebrating, which is rather more than Thatcher did. The policies & 'achievements' people are celebrating have been umitigated disasters. I'm pretty sure no other PM has had a 'special' funeral, & I don't think that any other PM has been ousted by their party while in office.

      Comment

      • Beef Oven

        Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
        I think you probably have worked that one out for yourself ?
        I'm sure you can find a load of weeping sheep on the Daily Mail website if thats what you seek ................

        So what music would YOU be playing this evening then Peester ?

        how about Elgar's ...... The Windlass ?
        Selling off state industries was not good, but we can be thankful for being liberated from the robber-barons that were strangling the country.

        RIP Maggie

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30253

          Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
          So what happened to the RIP bit?
          It's called being even-handed.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • MrGongGong
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 18357

            Originally posted by Beef Oven View Post
            Selling off state industries was not good, but we can be thankful for being liberated from the robber-barons that were strangling the country.

            RIP Maggie
            Robber Barons ?
            So selling off what was ours and now is owned by unknown private equity firms was a good thing ?

            I think not

            Comment

            • Beef Oven

              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
              Robber Barons ?
              So selling off what was ours and now is owned by unknown private equity firms was a good thing ?

              I think not
              You don't understand. I know it was quite vague when I said SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. What I meant was, SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. Clear now?

              The Robber Barons I was referring to were the Trades Unions. Stick to what you know

              Comment

              • MrGongGong
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 18357

                Originally posted by Beef Oven View Post
                You miss understand. I know it was quite vague when I said SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. What I meant was, SELLING OFF STATE INDUSTRIES WAS NOT GOOD. Clear now?

                The Robber Barons I was referring to were the Trades Unions. Stick to what you know
                I no miss

                You fall into the trap of the politicians of thinking that there are only two ways to do everything .............
                The basic Tory strategy is that EVERYTHING is better off run by "Barons"
                which is simply wrong
                but the alternative doesn't have to be a Collective Farm .......... there are many ways of doing things
                politicians like to think there are only two
                and they are wrong about that

                So is it Kipper policy to renationalise the power industry ?
                or water ?
                or the other things that ARE collective ?

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30253

                  Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                  So selling off what was ours and now is owned by unknown private equity firms was a good thing ?
                  And even though Macmillan said that 'as a Conservative' he was in favour of returning nationalised industries to the private sector, "What I ventured to question was the using of these huge sums as if they were income."
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Beef Oven

                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    I no miss

                    You fall into the trap of the politicians of thinking that there are only two ways to do everything .............
                    The basic Tory strategy is that EVERYTHING is better off run by "Barons"
                    which is simply wrong
                    but the alternative doesn't have to be a Collective Farm .......... there are many ways of doing things
                    politicians like to think there are only two
                    and they are wrong about that

                    So is it Kipper policy to renationalise the power industry ?
                    or water ?
                    or the other things that ARE collective ?
                    The chimp is talking to the professor!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • John Wright
                      Full Member
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 705

                      Originally Posted by John Wright View Post

                      Well, former PM Sir Winston Churchill had a very special funeral, one my early memories. I'm sure others did. It's someone else's decision Mary, not yours
                      Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                      Well, he did do something (eventually) worth celebrating, which is rather more than Thatcher did. The policies & 'achievements' people are celebrating have been umitigated disasters. I'm pretty sure no other PM has had a 'special' funeral, & I don't think that any other PM has been ousted by their party while in office.
                      Sorting out Scargill and the Falklands were hardly disasters. The miners suffered but Scargill was just as bad an enemy to them by not negotiating in a professional manner.



                      - and look at past PM's wikis and you read about special funerals Churchill and several others
                      - - -

                      John W

                      Comment

                      • MrGongGong
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 18357

                        Originally posted by Beef Oven View Post
                        The chimp is talking to the professor!!!!!!!!!!
                        I haven't seem the professor for a while ?
                        or are you over estimating your own qualifications ?

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 30253

                          Originally posted by John Wright View Post
                          The miners suffered but Scargill was just as bad an enemy to them by not negotiating in a professional manner.
                          Ah, yes, the miners. Macmillan again:

                          "It breaks my heart to see—and I cannot interfere—what is happening in our country today. This terrible strike, by the best men in the world, who beat the Kaiser's and Hitler's armies and never gave in. It is pointless and we cannot afford that kind of thing. Then there is the growing division of Conservative prosperity in the south and the ailing north and Midlands. We used to have battles and rows but they were quarrels. Now there is a new kind of wicked hatred that has been brought in by different types of people."
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • Beef Oven

                            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                            I haven't seem the professor for a while ?
                            or are you over estimating your own qualifications ?
                            Fair game, I'm no professor. Glad you didn't dispute the chimp bit.


                            Moving on, ok, so you met the grand old lady back in the day when you were a kid, but it doesn't mean you know more about her than me.


                            Comment

                            • DracoM
                              Host
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 12962

                              Hubris personified. The ugly legacy she left in the North of England still smarts and scars today.
                              Certainly NOT a state funeral. We did not know as much about other PMs. About Thatcher, we know a heck of a lot. I would be utterly opposed to a state funeral.

                              Comment

                              • John Wright
                                Full Member
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 705

                                Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                                And if the exclusion zone had recently been increased in size? It really does seem to be very convenient for Thatcher's government.

                                Thatcher herself did not use your argument in her wrangle (ff's word ) with Diana Gould. She used the 'Belgrano was a danger to our ships even when moving away' argument, which is pretty hard to swallow.
                                Well as I said, an exclusion zone defines certainty of attack, but in war one can attack retreaters wherever they may be. WWI and WWII guns were used in 'offensive action' or bombardments to blast the enemy and destroy their artillery when they were retreating or cowering in their trenches, and on the seas many 'retreating' battleships were chased by submarines until they were destroyed.
                                - - -

                                John W

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X