The Dictatorship of the Etonariat

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John Locke

    Originally posted by LHC View Post
    A 1% increase in income tax for everyone would generate significant sums because it would involve everyone paying more, rather than just a very small percentage of the population. However, that would also make it a very hard sell to the electorate.
    I wondered about that. The story was that when the top rate was reduced it didn't matter because it raised little revenue. That does not seem to me to be a strong reason for reducing it. I'm not sure how, all things being equal it would raise more revenue but I do not understand the intricacies.

    Originally posted by LHC View Post
    It’s much easier to sell tax increases for the ‘rich’ (or at least those richer than the general population) than ask everyone to make a larger contribution.
    I am always amazed at how much people can earn and still think of themselves as not well off.

    In short, I think non domiciled/tax haven beneficiaries should be taxed very heavily, also the extremely wealthy, on the grounds of at least nodding towards a move towards greater equality. But this needs to be carefully balanced, if for no other reason than that the Labour party does not rely on the 'working class' alone to propel it into power, and the middle class will be less enthusiastic - as with environmental measures - when they feel their personal lifestyles are adversely affected.

    Comment

    • Richard Barrett
      Guest
      • Jan 2016
      • 6259

      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
      I am very worried as to the apparent shortsightedness of Momentum's decision to raise this apparently at short notice, in which it seems even Corbyn let alone the executive was not informed
      I think there's a lot more to this than meets the eye. The media line on it feeds too conveniently into their preestablished narrative about Watson/Momentum/Corbyn etc. What evidence is there, for example, that this was "Momentum's decision"?

      Comment

      • ahinton
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 16122

        Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
        The media line on it feeds too conveniently into their preestablished narrative about Watson/Momentum/Corbyn etc. What evidence is there, for example, that this was "Momentum's decision"?
        I am not aware that there is any; at least I have not encountered any. That said, it must have been someone's decision, FWIW...

        Comment

        • John Locke

          Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
          What evidence is there, for example, that this was "Momentum's decision"?
          Jon Lansman tabled the motion. He could, of course, have been doing so without consulting his colleagues.

          Comment

          • Padraig
            Full Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 4231

            Originally posted by John Locke View Post
            Jon Lansman tabled the motion. He could, of course, have been doing so without consulting his colleagues.
            ...Or, could he.....?

            Description: The DEVIL'S GALOP- not quite the usual traditional jazz but a 'memory jerker' for people of a certain age group as theDICK BARTON SPECIAL AGENT ...

            Comment

            • Richard Barrett
              Guest
              • Jan 2016
              • 6259

              Originally posted by John Locke View Post
              Jon Lansman tabled the motion. He could, of course, have been doing so without consulting his colleagues.
              The point is that Lansman did so as a member of the NEC (to which he was elected by party members, not by Momentum, and in any case Momentum isn't affiliated to the party); and that as far as I've been able to tell the NEC would have passed the motion comfortably.

              Comment

              • John Locke

                Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                The point is that Lansman did so as a member of the NEC (to which he was elected by party members, not by Momentum, and in any case Momentum isn't affiliated to the party); and that as far as I've been able to tell the NEC passed the motion comfortably.
                I think you might be splitting hairs: a motion tabled by the chair of Momentum, in his capacity as an NEC member, and with the clear approval of the non-affiliated Momentum. This isn't just an invention of the right-wing media.

                Labour's ruling NEC is likely to approve a motion to abolish the party's deputy leader tomorrow – a move that will dominate this week's conference.


                Jon Lansman tried to scrap the post of deputy leader – currently held by Tom Watson – at the latest meeting of Labour's ruling body…

                Comment

                • Richard Barrett
                  Guest
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 6259

                  Originally posted by John Locke View Post
                  I think you might be splitting hairs: a motion tabled by the chair of Momentum, in his capacity as an NEC member, and with the clear approval of the non-affiliated Momentum.
                  Indeed. Maybe I should have put more stress on the fact that NEC members are elected by the entire party - and that Watson is regarded by a majority of members as displaying a long-term commitment to wrecking the party, so as to inherit whatever is left after the current leadership is deposed, even if this means losing a general election.

                  Comment

                  • John Locke

                    Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                    Indeed. Maybe I should have put more stress on the fact that NEC members are elected by the entire party - and that Watson is regarded by a majority of members as displaying a long-term commitment to wrecking the party, so as to inherit whatever is left after the current leadership is deposed, even if this means losing a general election.
                    What we can say from a distance is that a majority of the NEC backed Lansman's motion. We can also say that this created dismay among Labour MPs and rank and file party members who regarded this as appalling timing, just as conference was about to begin - probably the last one before a general election is called. And so much dismay that Jeremy Corbyn stepped in to quash the motion (albeit not the issue).

                    You may regard Watson as a 'wrecker', Momentum certainly does, your own constituency party may - but I'm not sure this is where the heart of the party is. In any case, talk of wreckers, enemies and saboteurs simply tears the party apart.

                    "The apathy amongst some of our members is caused by the softness of the Corbyn project on dealing with our enemies within the movement. The knives are already out once again, the olive branch hasn’t worked yet again. We need to expel saboteurs. Alastair Campbell’s departure is brilliant start — now we must clear out the other liberals so we can get on with building socialism."

                    “Shouldn’t be tolerated, let alone promoted, by a Labour Party in left control” Sarah Cundy, Manchester Momentum. Labour’s Tom Watson has said the bid to oust him as deputy leader…


                    What I don't understand is that Momentum unequivocally backed Remain in the referendum but I suppose Brexit must give way to higher ambitions.

                    Comment

                    • Richard Barrett
                      Guest
                      • Jan 2016
                      • 6259

                      Originally posted by John Locke View Post
                      What we can say from a distance is that a majority of the NEC backed Lansman's motion. We can also say that this created dismay among Labour MPs and rank and file party members who regarded this as appalling timing, just as conference was about to begin - probably the last one before a general election is called. And so much dismay that Jeremy Corbyn stepped in to quash the motion (albeit not the issue).
                      Yes, if that indeed is all there is to it, the timing seems very inappropriate. (But is it appropriate to go into a general election with people like Watson exacerbating what's already going to be portrayed in the media as a party at war with itself? Soemtimes you just can't win!) On the other hand, talk of wreckers might be divisive but I think it could be said that doing the wrecking is even more so.

                      Comment

                      • Bella Kemp
                        Full Member
                        • Aug 2014
                        • 458

                        What the above posts demonstrate is that sooner or later the Labour party will split into two parties - Real Labour (for want of a better term) and Momentum Labour. The Tories will also split and Britain will in time become accustomed to centre-left coalition governments (as is the lot for most Western democracies these days). No bad thing.

                        Comment

                        • ahinton
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 16122

                          Originally posted by Bella Kemp View Post
                          What the above posts demonstrate is that sooner or later the Labour party will split into two parties - Real Labour (for want of a better term) and Momentum Labour. The Tories will also split and Britain will in time become accustomed to centre-left coalition governments (as is the lot for most Western democracies these days). No bad thing.
                          Yes and no.

                          Yes, the divisiveness is prevalent, within the political parties and the country as a whole; that much seems clear. No, the problem is such that it seems likely to preclude any realistic possibility of the formation of a credible and viable government, since no one party or coalition of parties (even if one could be agreed, which itself seems less than likely) looks to be capable of securing a mandate to govern. Just imagine an ungovernable UK; it might not happen, but I will be unsurprised if it does.

                          Comment

                          • cloughie
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2011
                            • 22115

                            Originally posted by Bella Kemp View Post
                            What the above posts demonstrate is that sooner or later the Labour party will split into two parties - Real Labour (for want of a better term) and Momentum Labour. The Tories will also split and Britain will in time become accustomed to centre-left coalition governments (as is the lot for most Western democracies these days). No bad thing.
                            Of course this may lead to a stonkingly good middle ground party which rules sensibly and happily for many years!

                            Comment

                            • ahinton
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 16122

                              Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                              Of course this may lead to a stonkingly good middle ground party which rules sensibly and happily for many years!
                              And of what colour cheese is the moon made?...

                              Comment

                              • Richard Barrett
                                Guest
                                • Jan 2016
                                • 6259

                                Originally posted by Bella Kemp View Post
                                What the above posts demonstrate is that sooner or later the Labour party will split into two parties - Real Labour (for want of a better term) and Momentum Labour.
                                That's one possibility. it would be a shame though. My feeling is that, with the changing times, what you call Real Labour will eventually fall away because it won't be able to attract sufficient membership to be viable. One of the things that yesterday's "climate strike" shows is that young people are (at last) beginning once more to become more radical than their elders. The coming times are going to require more rather than less radicalism when it comes to tackling climate change. I don't think any kind of return to consensus politics is going to happen for some time.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X