Some food for thought, or otherwise:
Peter Eotvos article from The Globe & Mail
Collapse
X
-
Boulez once ... declared that anyone who wasn’t composing in an atonal serialist style was simply irrelevant.
* = or "experienced". ** = or "dodecaphonic Music"
And, in the United States, the composer Milton Babbitt once penned an essay entitled Who Cares If You Listen?, in which he defended the obscurity of his cerebral music.
If the writer of this article makes these two basic and slovenly mistakes, why should we believe that the rest of his article is going to be an accurate representation of what Eotvos (or anyone else "quoted" in it) actually said?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
-
-
heliocentric
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostIf the writer of this article makes these two basic and slovenly mistakes, why should we believe that the rest of his article is going to be an accurate representation of what Eotvos (or anyone else "quoted" in it) actually said?
Comment
-
Actually the sentence "the composer Milton Babbitt once penned an essay entitled Who Cares If You Listen?" is correct, except that he didn't entitle it that for its publication in High Fidelity.
More correct would be "the composer Milton Babbitt penned an essay once entitled (without his consent) Who Cares If You Listen?" But that doesn't have the same ring
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boilk View PostActually the sentence "the composer Milton Babbitt once penned an essay entitled Who Cares If You Listen?" is correct, except that he didn't entitle it that for its publication in High Fidelity.
More correct would be "the composer Milton Babbitt penned an essay once entitled (without his consent) Who Cares If You Listen?" But that doesn't have the same ring
... and with acknowledgement to hêlìöçèñtrïc's correct use of the ALT characters![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment